Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] [art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 27 November 2019 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C31120116; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:34:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bb3s-OZIUrA5; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:34:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7454A12006F; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:34:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.60.117] (76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xAR2WqUo071303 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 19:32:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] (may be forged) claimed to be [10.32.60.117]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, last-call@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis.all@ietf.org, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:34:17 -0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13r5655)
Message-ID: <42A97B53-6644-4FE1-B0EC-5B0B530531D6@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <23E269D1-06A1-4EE6-B886-5E5B3824C27E@tzi.org>
References: <3a7db097-84c0-4c44-aed0-51196a6a16b6@www.fastmail.com> <9F9A2298-0088-40B2-A69C-7F63D17EB8E3@nostrum.com> <A88B004F-6426-41BF-9711-4071A63637B5@mnot.net> <23E269D1-06A1-4EE6-B886-5E5B3824C27E@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Dyee6ohZtjIXiIdz-czyZwN9qpw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] [art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:34:25 -0000

On 26 Nov 2019, at 18:13, Carsten Bormann wrote:

> On Nov 27, 2019, at 02:56, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>
>> Do we expect most readers to be comparing the documents so closely? 
>> This is an 'obsoletes', not an 'updates'.
>
> Speaking for myself as a reader only: Yes.

Yes for me as well. Because 7320 has been used as a means of saying "you 
can't do what you want" to some protocol proposals, I definitely expect 
folks to look at the history if that happens in the future with 7320bis.

--Paul Hoffman