[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-15

Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 15 August 2020 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024883A0ACF; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.14.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <159753241794.3282.10287963728007886569@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:00:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/E3fSyM9gNp55ztZWgsLnPtkNq9A>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 23:00:18 -0000

Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-??
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2020-08-15
IETF LC End Date: 2020-08-13
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard, with a
couple of nits.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 0

Nits/editorial comments: 2

- Section 6: I understand that RFC7942 requests the authors to add a note to
the RFC Editor to remove this section, but I also understand that this is a
request to the author, and not a mandate (no normative language).   As an
implementer, I always find it easy to start with some bootstrapping  code, so I
find such implementation notes helpful.  You may wish to consider including
this information in an Appendix.

- Section 1, towards end of Page 3: s/that could be/that is often/ (Reason:
"could be" implies that truncation could happen, but is may not, "is often"
implies the same thing, but that phrase seems somehow more deterministic than
"could be".  This is a suggestion, please use your editorial discretion as