IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 27 November 2019 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152B0120B47; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:13:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dv2oNfe7n2P2; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:13:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D52120B45; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:13:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.116] (p548DC893.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.200.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47N47C6Gzqz10xX; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 03:13:11 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <A88B004F-6426-41BF-9711-4071A63637B5@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 03:13:11 +0100
Cc: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, last-call@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis.all@ietf.org, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 596513589.122836-263569aa4b68b0f04a4b08ac4fd09507
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <23E269D1-06A1-4EE6-B886-5E5B3824C27E@tzi.org>
References: <3a7db097-84c0-4c44-aed0-51196a6a16b6@www.fastmail.com> <9F9A2298-0088-40B2-A69C-7F63D17EB8E3@nostrum.com> <A88B004F-6426-41BF-9711-4071A63637B5@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/EHYsfY5D17t85JrHh_5VrsKtJLE>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:13:16 -0000

On Nov 27, 2019, at 02:56, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> Do we expect most readers to be comparing the documents so closely? This is an 'obsoletes', not an 'updates'.

Speaking for myself as a reader only: Yes.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email