IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Fri, 02 December 2011 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937A811E812E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:44:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_6CONS_WORD=0.356, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gf6k7aTVSvlG for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB16A11E812D for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id pB2MiJan014924 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:44:20 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id pB2MiJIT013089 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:44:19 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id pB2MiIel021411; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:44:19 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4ED95589.3040608@bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:47:37 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
References: <4ED66709.50304@bell-labs.com> <22C7D48E-485B-4333-B29A-DB16BCCD3626@fh-muenster.de> <4ED69BB9.4030001@bell-labs.com> <4369045C-3B5C-4310-BF67-D141A34498BB@fh-muenster.de> <4ED936E9.9040402@bell-labs.com> <D03638C3-51E3-455D-B3D5-25586F92A15A@fh-muenster.de>
In-Reply-To: <D03638C3-51E3-455D-B3D5-25586F92A15A@fh-muenster.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst@tools.ietf.org, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:44:55 -0000

On 12/02/2011 03:25 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> the above is incorrect... It is not important which side establishes
> the SCTP association. No matter how it was established, a uni-directional
> stream is outgoing for one side, incoming for the other.
> After the association has been established, you have n uni-directional
> streams from A to B, and m uni-directional streams from B to A.
>
> For the n streams, A is the outgoing side, B the incoming. For the m
> streams, B is the outgoing side, A is the incoming side. No matter
> if A is client, B is server, vice versa, or both were acting as peers.

Michael: OK, I suspect that the average reader of your draft
will have much more SCTP context than I do (my mind wants to view
SCTP through the TCP lens).  So, I will defer to the modified
text you suggested in your earlier email [1].

I have no further comments.

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06952.html

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email