Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04

[Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I think it's good to have separate (sub-)sections per RFC. Also, if some specific section of an RFC is updated, it is sometimes good to mention, depending on how difficult it will be for a reader to "map" the updates into the RFCs.

Things may be obvious to people who have worked with the RFCs, and know them by heart, but we have to think about the first-time readers/implementors :)

Also, I think "Recommendations" sounds confusing. The "recommend" wording normally has another meaning in RFCs. And, you are not recommending anything - you are specifying.

Regards,

Christer

________________________________________
From: Sam Hartman [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 6:01 PM
To: Tom Yu
Cc: Christer Holmberg; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04

My peresonal preference is to retain Recommendations as the title to
section 5.
I have no opinion on whether adding subsections would be a good idea or
not.
It's probably not worth spinning a new draft for that but if people
believe it desirable it's fine to fold in with other changes in my
opinion.
Obviously, wait for direction from our AD.