Re: [Gen-art] [IANA #818133] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-03.txt> (Clarification of the Flowspec Redirect Extended Community) to Proposed Standard
Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net> Fri, 10 April 2015 23:10 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894AB1B2E38; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PpY9chtNlJLP; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 933331B2E33; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmcginniss-sslvpn-nc.jnpr.net (66.129.241.13) by BLUPR05MB150.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.190.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.130.23; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:10:36 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6E5DCFE5-20D7-4423-9A24-BD376D7336E1"
From: Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <018201d073d7$b76ad860$26408920$@ndzh.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:10:27 -0400
Message-ID: <8F622A02-E7C0-48D2-856A-ABAD2385CBE0@juniper.net>
References: <RT-Ticket-818133@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-814082@icann.org> <20150318203322.17138.21318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-11179-1428432109-1333.814082-7-0@icann.org> <04a501d07325$d512fd00$7f38f700$@ndzh.com> <rt-4.2.9-24558-1428683859-663.818133-7-0@icann.org> <03889FBF-8BF9-4E95-B979-0D2E8AE87E26@juniper.net> <018201d073d7$b76ad860$26408920$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [66.129.241.13]
X-ClientProxiedBy: BY2PR11CA0080.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (25.163.150.176) To BLUPR05MB150.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.190.151)
Authentication-Results: ndzh.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB150;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(51704005)(377454003)(24454002)(84326002)(57306001)(77096005)(93886004)(42186005)(83716003)(50986999)(40100003)(110136001)(53416004)(122386002)(66066001)(33656002)(92566002)(512934002)(76176999)(230783001)(19580395003)(2950100001)(19580405001)(87976001)(86362001)(46102003)(77156002)(82746002)(50226001)(62966003)(36756003)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB150; H:dmcginniss-sslvpn-nc.jnpr.net; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <BLUPR05MB150CF7F1520D234C469CA97A5FA0@BLUPR05MB150.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5002010)(5005006); SRVR:BLUPR05MB150; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB150;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 054231DC40
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Apr 2015 23:10:36.0865 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB150
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/EZDVM8Y99rPANyZpuJnrlszeTfE>
Cc: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, idr-chairs@ietf.org, drafts-lastcall@iana.org, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [IANA #818133] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-03.txt> (Clarification of the Flowspec Redirect Extended Community) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:10:43 -0000
Sue, On Apr 10, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: > Sue, is there any reason to not use a similar registration range as the 0x80 > range? I.e.: > 0x00-0xbf - FCFS > 0xc0-0xff - IETF review? > > Sue: I am fine with use but it was not spelled out in the draft. If this is > the range, we will need a 2 Week LC to confirm this range for both types for > both types. Revise the draft so IANA can confirm, and I'll start the 2 WG LC > in parallel with the other processes. Since neither of our proposals were covered in the draft originally, it makes sense to go for an updated WGLC/IETF LC anyway. Once IANA confirms that the updated text is clear, I'll issue -04 and you can start that. -- Jeff