Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <> Thu, 01 December 2016 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3389D1294C2 for <>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 05:53:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.418
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dOVoZ6CeNLNh for <>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 05:53:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33C21294B0 for <>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 05:53:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=3126; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1480600395; x=1481809995; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=HHwJCPvQ6Znk7ttKj61aGJdUksnAeSgfhQddq6DPZ70=; b=mMLejvwB6zNfG+lItQqdfCYsJNkh3ZAMJB7c7rF5TgVYLIm4RuIRjJM+ TT1Hsmn24nAQx5E63TNBjbtgw94GDoFZZGhyvX++afTQPMzE0X8Fpi8+9 q2wnuK1ZQkiCkuAMJ4n2NWo1BCOFjJpz5TcBDxPouo88S6OOM1242NJDe Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,282,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="353810483"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Dec 2016 13:53:15 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uB1DrEKd016845 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:53:14 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:53:14 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:53:14 -0500
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <>
To: Dan Romascanu <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
Thread-Index: AQHSRxnbvRQefvcg3kuAguWW9q34aaDz1lWA
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 13:53:13 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 13:53:18 -0000

Hi Dan,

Thanks for your review. Please see inline

From: Dan Romascanu <>
Date: Friday, 25 November 2016 at 5:46 PM
To: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
Resent-From: <>, <>
Resent-To: <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, Andrew Hutton <>, <>
Resent-Date: Friday, 25 November 2016 at 5:46 PM

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at




Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 11/25/16
IETF LC End Date: 11/27/16
IESG Telechat date: (if known) 12/2/16

Summary: Ready.

This is a very useful supporting document in the SIPREC cluster.

Major issues:


Minor issues:


Nits/editorial comments:

1. The title is slightly misleading, as the document does not have as goal to document all or the most important call flows, but rather to provide a grouping of significant examples. 'Examples of SUP Recording Call Flows' may have been a better title.

<Ram> I agree. The document contains only most important call flows. So I will rename to “Examples of SIP Recording Call Flows”

2. As the document uses terminology defined in [RFC7865] and [RFC6341], listing these two RFCs as Normative References seems necessary (can't understand the terms without reading the two RFCs)

<Ram> agree. Will do that.

3. typo in the Securoty Considerations section: '

Security considerations mentioned in [RFC7865] and [RFC7866] has to be followed ...

s/has to/have to/

<Ram> Thanks will fix it.