[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-04

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sun, 05 February 2017 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DA7129705; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:43:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.42.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148633102421.31577.5350933097680027453.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 13:43:44 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/EyfGxUxcS-od-kJhUJPPhttXnlc>
Cc: draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 21:43:44 -0000

Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2017-02-05
IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-15
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational
RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:
    The second figure in section 4.4 talks about the use of multiple
3x3 tables, but appears to show the use of multiple 4x4 tables.  This
reader found himself confused.

Nits/editorial comments: