[Gen-art] IANA considerations, was: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 20 January 2015 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB93F1AC3D0; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:15:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBoUqumB6yiH; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB501B2DB1; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ([]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LezI3-1XNfcf3OpT-00qgLN; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:14:47 +0100
Message-ID: <54BE1C80.1020100@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:14:40 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362DE459@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <CABkgnnUwNQUcFg5w5HFpSQrAUxtbqG_UN-_WDGop1eqqoCS+Aw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUwNQUcFg5w5HFpSQrAUxtbqG_UN-_WDGop1eqqoCS+Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EmwjnbnZ5FbwdEo7++3KvYhpICjcE9gKFPcopQBuvM9nilsDY8i bssC8CceGHc+PtmlsjxRqKmqA5CQnYJ1PFvzLlebcVZuIxtYOdIHIQ7RsV6xXs8JdFD6n98 dHNe6DjYGp9RpERE/LwB6ACeTpAbVo5iJy8qdTWfSO5T+VtUSW7RYCHD0kqZ/lQ37+Kek92 LBCfOwFB/8q9as+Z2BR1A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/FN74l8JI_DKL90IbCRx7ESL-0cw>
Cc: "fenix@google.com" <fenix@google.com>, "General Area Review Team \(gen-art@ietf.org\)" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr" <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Subject: [Gen-art] IANA considerations, was: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:15:30 -0000

On 2015-01-20 09:22, Martin Thomson wrote:
> ...
>> idnits complained that it couldn't find an IANA Considerations
>> section.  Please add an empty one (stating that there are no IANA
>> Considerations) if/when the draft is revised.
> I tend to think that absence of "IANA Considerations" and a section
> with "This document has no IANA actions." should be treated as
> precisely equivalent.  But I guess that ship sailed already.
> ...

Having no "IANA Considerations" causes additional work because multiple 
parties will have to check whether there's indeed nothing to consider, 
or whether the authors just forgot to think about these. It causes 
unneeded friction and delays.

Best regards, Julian