IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 24 August 2021 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5883A2310; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 04:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TExHDq7lZSKR; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 04:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9A53A230D; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 04:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:1815:5480:b768:b865]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76588600373; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:12:08 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1629803528; bh=taP0n6GlcIrwnsedTfBZ4u5m2CYoEMOWxOAQdYImoug=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=VCJM00a9kQxP2+bimEGSmq9szXy8pt02w+zwm1KsM6t89F0u6clqAgHFhMSubJqwK YJL1WgQK2QX5I6Ik0sMRHvyqUppiszpseO60qo/Snlc2ordqZDzzwJO1lRwxy1izVa 1qF4/svUIbig02HvwvzQAGn6XL6Tsy55AjotqvAs=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <5660DCA3-3CA8-4818-9156-9D9D721F03E6@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EE1D7DEC-C598-4559-A613-ACC295300572"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:12:07 +0300
In-Reply-To: <162879336918.10574.10010152000496998787@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, last-call@ietf.org
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <162879336918.10574.10010152000496998787@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 76588600373.A02AB
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/FRGdawet01b4pVK2bZoQxk0aF7g>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:12:26 -0000

David, thank you for your review. I have entered a (procedural) Discuss ballot for this document (due to a still-missing IANA review).

Lars


> On 2021-8-12, at 21:36, David Schinazi via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: David Schinazi
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
> (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
> Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For
> more information, please see the FAQ at
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13
> Reviewer: David Schinazi
> Review Date: 2021-08-12
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-07-23
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: Well-written and easy to read document.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues:
> * s4.5 seems to prohibit defining new non-generic HTTP methods. How do we
> reconcile that with the work happening in MASQUE? I know that CONNECT is its
> own special-case, but should we have a carveout here? (Though MASQUE might end
> up using extended CONNECT which side steps the issue). Or is it the case that
> MASQUE is modifying HTTP itself instead of building an application over HTTP?
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> * s3.2 uses the term "link" without explaining what it is. Perhaps a reference
> to RFC 8288 if that's what is meant here? * s4.11 mentions HTTP/3 without
> referencing its specification
> 
> 
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email