IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Wed, 04 March 2015 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821FC1A876B for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:09:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j93mBsHEBhM5 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in5.apple.com (mail-out5.apple.com [17.151.62.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B509F1A8777 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:09:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1425427776; x=2289341376; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+ILDu6JPOIJMfJoc3+cONTcdDPgREuCL5LO9/GSoLxM=; b=o2JUVlJXP+TbATGVrJyB+HRUCwFIHYE1oMkfFNza/DHKbtNiCHv5A14uUKMlMt5q zgPgpQG+dQaKMHIksuzw+HBnwIveStnY6B21b2sNQe6H3tV55uDR36aKkJ9x6mK3 8Ql1aopWVn0YSEruqfgZNryWFeAP7Kbugsg9Gui7k07r/B3/BaaFwn6vkvSz3vOY jp0gs3O5/CdzDIUCocQSWjUB9YaDAHTdcIVJKFE2vSxmvuaMPegYgJD7kjN0F8Je iAdwDNqOmID69VrW225aUKf8ZgB4tsVzW9kYWOzfjxQJvApZfxwOHMQg2aqRA+WK 0EWG0OTz4WWM5kaL8DEfxQ==;
Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.88]) by mail-in5.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 80.E9.22154.04D46F45; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:09:36 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e13-f79d56d00000568a-28-54f64d40303c
Received: from nwk-phonehomebzp-sz01 (nwk-phonehomebzp-sz01.apple.com [17.151.62.64]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id C1.47.32046.24D46F45; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [17.153.23.83] by nwk-phonehomebzp-sz01.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NKN006YGV3Y7I20@nwk-phonehomebzp-sz01.apple.com> for gen-art@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <17D4E7BD-2961-4D16-B46D-4C8999BF3A7E@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:09:36 -0800
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <B4911DE2-4321-4DAC-BA1B-B1977AD57976@apple.com>
References: <1CE5A7D5-3CB4-4991-86CE-94288599825F@nostrum.com> <CABOxzu0x9UeBP7tVO-txY9T+5pgb_dDt-vpFCeAonChjcnz3DQ@mail.gmail.com> <633CD902-FE17-4783-9AF4-D0419D99A926@nostrum.com> <CABOxzu07xUXDqAP7NhRJ1QH89fPoh7HATfHCiVrR2Ta=5NPpCg@mail.gmail.com> <17D4E7BD-2961-4D16-B46D-4C8999BF3A7E@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYoevg+y3EYO0cHourrz6zODB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEro793N0vBBbaKZ9+3MTcwfmTpYuTkkBAwkWh4socVwhaTuHBv PVsXIxeHkMBeRol9c3eywxQtmH2IGSKxgEmiZep9JghnMpPE10mXgKo4OJgF1CWmTMkFaeAV MJD4svMoWLOwgJPEhe/zmUBsNgEtiRefr7CB2JwC9hJ3r04Bu4JFQFVixrRrjCAzmQW2Mkr8 e3oX7CRmAW2JJ+8usEIMtZHYeGgGK8TibUwSL45vYgRJiAB1b2+dwAJyhISAvETPpnSQGgmB v6wSZyc3ME1gFJ6FcN8sJPfNQrJiASPzKkah3MTMHN3MPFO9xIKCnFS95PzcTYygQJ5uJ7yD 8fQqq0OMAhyMSjy8E9i/hgixJpYVV+YeYpTmYFES511X+yVESCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUovqg0J7X4 ECMTB6dUA2Mvv2V5VVLPV+knp3te39a/sHamv1l1cIpca+GsF2qxsQczXnAVNaqbLw3adO/H Hje3kFzFyWuaffl/HM9Y+8d/zk+/S399Nqh9Do4ulS7SaX8wuyFARGi+4e4X879c4Vhy+une Y7fPqmsJ3Zn/tD1ywb5l9nL6Jp+/Tl/s5Blzwr0jYuEct2olluKMREMt5qLiRAAcQ5y8RQIA AA==
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON3OQdfJ91uIwZMlBhZXX31mcWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXRn/vbpaCC2wVz75vY25g/MjSxcjJISFgIrFg9iFmCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgILmCRapt5ngnAmM0l8nXSJvYuRg4NZQF1iypRckAZeAQOJLzuPsoPYwgJOEhe+ z2cCsdkEtCRefL7CBmJzCthL3L06BWwZi4CqxIxp1xhBZjILbGWU+Pf0LitIgllAW+LJuwus EENtJDYemsEKsXgbk8SL45sYQRIiQN3bWyewgBwhISAv0bMpfQKjwCyEk2YhOWkWkqkLGJlX MQoUpeYkVprqJRYU5KTqJefnbmIEBV5DYcQOxv/LrA4xCnAwKvHwTmD/GiLEmlhWXJl7iFGC g1lJhPexwbcQId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rzPd34IERJITyxJzU5NLUgtgskycXBK NTBmhk/hK4lYocXecEL0ocTTm92Tm0qO992xLBYQke3kqnT5E9bO7JspIxj09lBmU6Xg4TXT N5lJqm8RqJ17dP65WYf7Lcxn9uppXK8vXbB8qpbt+lmCC6+79P5j+MS29ZGBHqOYNpvnubVh rz+XfE5b1a62Jrfz0baYS48aNgZv6cpnXf/psbASS3FGoqEWc1FxIgAELKUjOAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/FRN8EdmHbpIa7RBDH6CN0mbyVAA>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>, draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org, "gen-art@ietf.org Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:09:45 -0000

On 23 Dec, 2014, at 19:03, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> Why not update the document to say so explicitly, and fix the idnits while you're at it?

I have added some text to clarify this.

   REQ2:   For use cases C, D, and E, there should be a way to configure
           Scopes of Discovery that support a range of topologically-
           independent zones (e.g., from department to campus-wide).
           This capability must exist in the protocol; individual
           operators are not required to use this capability in all
           cases -- in particular, use case C should support Zero
           Configuration operation where that is desired.

We should let the RFC Editor update the references at publication time -- there’s little benefit in chasing a moving target.

Stuart Cheshire

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status