[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-10

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Wed, 21 March 2012 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9EC21F863F for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.971
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.971 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.372, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfZZG9snIyVz for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CEA21F8646 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q2LF6YgW023747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:06:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q2LF6UqS022366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:06:34 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q2LF5wod004840; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:06:07 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4F69EF74.3080309@bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:10:44 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "msk@cloudmark.com" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:06:43 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-10
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Mar-21-2012
IETF LC End Date: Mar-14-2012
IESG Telechat date: March-15-2012 (*** Sorry for the delay ***)

Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: 0
Minor issues: 0
Nits/editorial comments: 1

Nits:

- The referencing in this document seems odd.  For example, normal
  referencing would be:

     As required by IANA [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS], ...

  Here, the reference object is "IANA" and the reference is
  "IANA-CONSIDERATIONS".  xml2rfc creates a link from "IANA-
  CONSIDERATIONS" to the References section.

  However, this draft uses referencing as follows:

     As required by [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS], ...

  This essentially conflates the reference object ("IANA") with
  the reference itself ("IANA-CONSIDERATIONS").

  I suspect that this is a stylistic convention used by the authors,
  so if they are happy with it then they can feel free to disregard
  this comment.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/