IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05

Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com> Mon, 20 April 2015 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <Johannes.Merkle@secunet.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7031B2C2A; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wo58djnBFU6C; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [195.81.216.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3A11B2C29; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3101A0080; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yiPHHITze3oQ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.204]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1A51A007F; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.208.1.212] (10.208.1.212) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:43 +0200
Message-ID: <55350A0F.7080709@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:43 +0200
From: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D793917@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <020c01d0769f$0076aec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D7986AF@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.208.1.212]
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/HlEz7V-UUG5X-dhNcrGzEUb_rAE>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:15:50 -0000

Dear all,

I will revise the draft according to the remaining comments.

Johannes

Christer Holmberg schrieb am 14.04.2015 um 13:08:
> Hi Tom,
> 
>>> Q1_10-1: In the IANA Considerations section, IANA is requested to register new values. However, it is not mentioned in which registry the new values will be registered.
>>
>> <tp>
>>
>> Christer
>>
>> You puzzle me.  When I look in the I-D I see
>>
>> "IANA is requested to assign a value in the SnmpAuthProtocols registry "
>>
>> which looks to me like a mention of which registry the new values will be registered in.
> 
> You are right, I missed that. Sorry for the confusion. I withdraw the comment.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email