[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-06

Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 22 May 2024 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395E1C14CE54; Wed, 22 May 2024 09:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.11.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171639541222.12592.2829202750188440115@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 09:30:12 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: XCY3WAVOK2N7NN2XS6VC27PZZKS4CKHI
X-Message-ID-Hash: XCY3WAVOK2N7NN2XS6VC27PZZKS4CKHI
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-0; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-1; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-2; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: bmwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-06
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gen-art-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gen-art-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gen-art-leave@ietf.org>

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-06

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2024-05-22
IETF LC End Date: 2024-05-22
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC with nits

Nits/editorial comments:

There are places in the text that say "The authors are aware" - the
construction seems out of place for a consensus IETF stream document - I'm not
sure if this was the resolution of an argument, or just text that could be
further changed to "Note that" or something similar.

I support the concerns Michael raised in his tsvart review.

Please consider reaching out to the RFC-Editor early for how to best represent
the small block of pseudocode in the xml for the document.