Return-Path: X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B62212B14B for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:24:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.589 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oxXlf4n3uiyB for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi0-x263.google.com (mail-oi0-x263.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::263]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0E2212B00D for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x263.google.com with SMTP id w11so10083063oia.0 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:24:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verisign-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=hAfQ5YJSi1Dl95uxmJ2r5XkEKMFpt73xDCdm3S9zIqk=; b=lmO2Ex7U+h3zKQ2+kfSuWM6sfDqB6tit0zjKAiPxdqJrsntdY+ODuV8r7fzbzv4fNZ 4/TyQbV7G+6x4fhptJpzptF8RXBhcOSCl3e5R7n7QP2xLovycXyfl+EGG0ZzbTOJHvsU zI/uroU+TnbzhGSLYr9GN4czyOOPC6C3F0mLpPHaOJwm8BercUNXN+wWx0zHuwsiUJDa ozASAPJlkHUEi2A3L8ufiwq2+uWhzjG/1UAZvRLmZ8TvbSutR2Ccl1Y+96kU6mIN3KU/ 5YC4fh3gXWAywB1j3/pE+9o5q0YpQ5oWTRWq/Ry5RO8cqViNJcHAZsUn3AB1o2CHAC5Q JyeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:mime-version; bh=hAfQ5YJSi1Dl95uxmJ2r5XkEKMFpt73xDCdm3S9zIqk=; b=VTBd7VbSA4QCXI6uYibLfCEansn7d3vN6gBoZI1ZrVCRjlu/RyNvOr9A9t3ECFDruB /o6fbvlRhmj1TR455mbUACxou1+D+z6PmE8e4SBe6AVh1xmlWPDXJUNULnbHN88T3HFt swacdBN9LPLJaRTTgMtOIUAxC79mNpdO9imwTlJa6IsMtZd5phWaeHnQl9XKhPl9YyER yMvHI4RLomVUjkQAdaoha8gmEAxLCRwGYHEwDKuwBr4qjBaWJ4tkku6nDWeol4m3+/cB hH4RcESu4/sfbz8w9fb0ljy2Gsw/KNuHWtPHbDAxsjFaAG3YHGiutGVIVlE790KSn7y9 a3mA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMrRIMeXHjTb08q1sDCYubHoPAcMGt2tOvddkQZRVu4TeoTm2V/u06NOG3Ju/OMNGjowNi9zZZyhp559O4sR7476wKC X-Received: by 10.55.214.68 with SMTP id t65mr32581506qki.216.1474320241934; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com. [72.13.63.41]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id j190sm4188707qkd.9.2016.09.19.14.24.01 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:24:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u8JLO0TB031261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:24:01 -0400 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:23:58 -0400 From: "Kaliski, Burt" To: Lucy yong Thread-Topic: [Gem-art] Gem-ART review of draft-moriaty-pkcs1-03 Thread-Index: AdIPbT27VIohZU1dTfWQfj5cNaMGrgDToIsw Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:23:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D572D4C78@dfweml501-mbb> In-Reply-To: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D572D4C78@dfweml501-mbb> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8387BC3FC075E4EAD935BF5752561063D013871BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "draft-moriarty-pkcs1@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Gem-art] Gem-ART review of draft-moriaty-pkcs1-03 X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:24:04 -0000 --_000_B8387BC3FC075E4EAD935BF5752561063D013871BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Lucy, Thank you very much for the careful review. These are all good catches, especially the need to change several labels fr= om "PKCS" to "PKCS1" to match the corresponding PKCS #1 v2.2 document: htt= ps://www.emc.com/collateral/white-papers/h11300-pkcs-1v2-2-rsa-cryptography= -standard-wp.pdf My co-authors may have additional feedback. n Burt From: Lucy yong [mailto:lucy.yong@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 12:22 PM To: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-moriarty-pkcs1@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Gem-art] Gem-ART review of draft-moriaty-pkcs1-03 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-AR= T, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-moriaty-pkcs1-03 Reviewer: Lucy Yong Review Date: 15 September 2016 IETF LC End Date: 2 September 2016 Summary: The document is well written, and is ready for publication as Informational= RFC. IPR considerations are in Appendix D. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: * Several places use xxx-PKCS-v1_5, should it be xxx-PKCS1-v1_5? whe= re xxx may be EMSA, RSAES, and RSASSA. Editorial Issues: * Please check the Idnits tool * Page 18: s/k - 2hLen -2/k - 2hLen - 2/ * Page 18: s/"knowing"the/"knowing" the/ * Page 40: s/ -- such as the salt value in EMSA-PSS --/ such as the = salt value in EMSA-PSS/ * replace Section 7.2.2. title with "Decryption operation" * In Section 8.2, s/Note:/Note./ (to be consistent with the rest o= f doc.) * Section 8.2 last paragraph, replace "recommended" with "RECOMMENDE= D" Regards, Lucy --_000_B8387BC3FC075E4EAD935BF5752561063D013871BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Lucy,<= /span>

 

Thank you very much fo= r the careful review.

 

These are all good cat= ches, especially the need to change several labels from “PKCS” = to “PKCS1” to match the corresponding PKCS #1 v2.2 document:&nb= sp; https://www.emc.com/collateral/white-papers/h11300-pkcs-1v2-2-rsa-cryptogra= phy-standard-wp.pdf

 

My co-authors may have= additional feedback.

 

n  Burt

 

From: Lucy yon= g [mailto:lucy.yong@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 12:22 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-moriarty-pkcs1@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gem-art] Gem-ART review of draft-moriaty-pkcs1-03

 

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For backgr= ound on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki= /GenArtfaq> 

Document:    &n= bsp;            &nbs= p;     draft-moriaty-pkcs1-03

Reviewer: = ;             &= nbsp;          Lucy Yong

Review Date:    = ;             &= nbsp; 15 September 2016

IETF LC End Date:   =          2 September 2016

 

Summary:

The document is well written, and is ready for publication as= Informational RFC. IPR considerations are in Appendix D.

Major Issues:    None

Minor Issues:   

·        Several places use xxx-= PKCS-v1_5, should it be xxx-PKCS1-v1_5? where xxx may be EMSA, RSAES, and R= SASSA.

Editorial Issues:

·        Please check the Idnits tool

·        Page 18: s/k - 2hLen -2/k - 2hLen - 2/<= /o:p>

·        Page 18: s/"knowing"the/"know= ing" the/ 

·        Page 40: s/ -- such as = the salt value in EMSA-PSS --/ such as the salt value in EMSA-PSS/

·        replace Section 7.2.2. = title with “Decryption operation”

·        In Section 8.2, s/Note:= /Note./   (to be consistent with the rest of doc.)

·        Section 8.2 last paragr= aph, replace “recommended” with “RECOMMENDED”<= /o:p>

Regards,

Lucy

--_000_B8387BC3FC075E4EAD935BF5752561063D013871BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_--