Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence

Thanks, all. Many thanks Joel for your review, and on focusing on key issues.

Jari

On 03 Nov 2015, at 06:17, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> Thank you.  This addresses my concern.
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 11/2/15 11:14 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>> Hi Julien, All,
>> 
>> So now we have - (and thanks for bearing with me, as we get there...)
>> 
>>    IGP Area subobjects in the XRO are local to the current AS.  In case
>>    of multi-AS path computation to exclude an IGP area in a different
>>    AS, IGP Area subobject should be part of Explicit Exclusion Route
>>    Subobject (EXRS) in the IRO to specify the AS in which the IGP area
>>    is to be excluded.  Further policy may be applied to prune/ignore
>>    Area subobjects in XRO after "current AS" change during path
>>    computation.
>> 
>> I have also attached the diff of the working copy to show the GenArt and IANA review changes so far.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence

Attachment: signature.asc