Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 19 November 2015 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07661A0103; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 03:18:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OwlhjB2Z5oja; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 03:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03421A015F; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 03:18:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1D62CC5C; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:18:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LROtGpQ9xnJ7; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:18:41 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E3E2CC52; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:18:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FC124FC5-2E50-442E-BB40-50C0B1E13000"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <56383575.9000004@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:18:40 +0200
Message-Id: <755D00D0-0791-4BCB-B81B-A6C583D01989@piuha.net>
References: <5631337F.3050703@nostrum.com> <56320B67.9050309@nostrum.com> <56328BAB.2000208@joelhalpern.com> <CAB75xn5xsMsZBYWnGpBLn8nHz_5ttMJBkcjZZgC0uZzOBfPvBQ@mail.gmail.com> <56336308.2080504@joelhalpern.com> <56338E34.1000109@orange.com> <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C434C03@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <563787DF.6070103@orange.com> <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C435982@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <56383575.9000004@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ItUgfmCnIVIcuIHU_p52iJYhdsg>
Cc: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:18:47 -0000

Thanks, all. Many thanks Joel for your review, and on focusing on key issues.

Jari

On 03 Nov 2015, at 06:17, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> Thank you.  This addresses my concern.
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 11/2/15 11:14 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>> Hi Julien, All,
>> 
>> So now we have - (and thanks for bearing with me, as we get there...)
>> 
>>    IGP Area subobjects in the XRO are local to the current AS.  In case
>>    of multi-AS path computation to exclude an IGP area in a different
>>    AS, IGP Area subobject should be part of Explicit Exclusion Route
>>    Subobject (EXRS) in the IRO to specify the AS in which the IGP area
>>    is to be excluded.  Further policy may be applied to prune/ignore
>>    Area subobjects in XRO after "current AS" change during path
>>    computation.
>> 
>> I have also attached the diff of the working copy to show the GenArt and IANA review changes so far.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art