Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of
Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 16 December 2015 16:57 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E0A1A6EDC; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:57:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gt9VWB2wCzQO; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0791.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:791]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47CA51A6F99; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1987.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.355.16; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:55:55 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0355.012; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:55:54 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of
Thread-Index: AdE3ejRyQmcdOK6DT0mdjMo6ZB4sXwAqArgA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:55:54 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB1985617B205AE8B040CF2D80AEEF0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbonica@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1987; 5:FrhHLRXDSArKmW6aw3/1wPjKB39gyRomkmhwp++3q649Nv8oG3pEijQy+MSeYhbnfqhC5pEtPOZefgbuEuN486MTYUGoVWQfxkI/rloeC9+k69H14Z/+Vrf8NbNwJNkimK5FoBFAlA5f8CNYBqhykw==; 24:vq8YN27OGytahNXOlxdUT1To8EXz/F1yCy8Ig4Xb8uWcC3wnc+yVtl4n5PzW+BjG2IyPPedRKO7+fqBFmfHVdY0Qbj+33B3qvbeO3QUocKU=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1987;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB1987C074DE65F21410F99934AEEF0@BLUPR05MB1987.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1987; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1987;
x-forefront-prvs: 0792DBEAD0
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(199003)(189002)(377424004)(377454003)(77096005)(2501003)(2900100001)(3846002)(15975445007)(54356999)(50986999)(76576001)(99286002)(105586002)(106356001)(102836003)(1096002)(5008740100001)(1220700001)(586003)(6116002)(40100003)(33656002)(101416001)(86362001)(92566002)(87936001)(5004730100002)(10400500002)(81156007)(122556002)(4001150100001)(66066001)(5003600100002)(107886002)(97736004)(74316001)(5001960100002)(5001770100001)(450100001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(189998001)(5002640100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1987; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Dec 2015 16:55:54.7869 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1987
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/JSK273nOoE7Wkn7PdXLusuwvNPo>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:57:43 -0000
Folks,
The authors of this draft have informed me this document is required by the wg charter. So, I withdraw any criticisms about this document's limited scope. The scope was dictated by the charter.
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bonica
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 4:01 PM
> To: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>; 'draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org'
> <draft-ietf-pals-congcons.all@ietf.org>
> Subject: Gen-ART review of
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
> ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>
> Document: draft-ietf-pals-congcons-01
> Reviewer: Ron Bonica
> Review Date: 2015-12-15
> IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-15
> IETF Telechat Date: TBD
>
> Summary: This document is ready for publication
>
> In summary, draft-ietf-congcons-01:
>
> - applies only to pseudowires that run over something other than MPLS (e.g.,
> GRE)
> - concludes that no additional mechanisms are needed for elastic
> pseudowires
> - concludes that an inelastic pseudowire MAY shutdown when it experiences
> higher-than-acceptable loss, latency or jitter
> - observes that that for TDM PWs, as loss rate increases, higher-than-
> acceptable loss generally occurs before the fixed-rate TDM PW could cause
> serious problems for competing congestion-responsive traffic
> - Therefore, no additional mechanisms are needed for inelastic pseudowires,
> either
>
> I see nothing objectionable in the draft. However, its scope is extremely
> limited and it conclusions are not earthshattering. Nonetheless, the work is
> sound and deserves publication.
>
> Major Issues: None
>
> Minor Issues: None
>
> Editorial Issues:
>
> Ron Bonica
>
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of Ronald Bonica
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of Ronald Bonica
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of Jari Arkko
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of jouni korhonen
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of nalini.elkins