Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-03

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 01 October 2015 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D721A910B for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GyfIX4lsLAj for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9B81A8A3D for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB9E2CECD; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:30:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TUAku56s7HhU; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:30:39 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F372CC6B; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:30:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D8A229B8-D619-484C-B45C-0543E9C20225"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAFqGwGsJj8rpAxrhonuOYoF7tVJ5GVHLq-HZmV1G2hTwThd5Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:30:38 +0300
Message-Id: <C278AE57-CD04-4B68-9749-60F6E0688D44@piuha.net>
References: <55D9DC53.1050307@gmail.com> <CAFqGwGsJj8rpAxrhonuOYoF7tVJ5GVHLq-HZmV1G2hTwThd5Nw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nobo Akiya <nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/JifmUTlXOt4cy-AE-vw1Ve38AR4>
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@mail101.huawei.com>, Gen Art <gen-art@ietf.org>, "Mach (Guoyi) Chen" <mach.chen@huawei.com>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, Deborah Brungard <dbrungard@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:30:44 -0000

Thank you Tom!

On 30 Aug 2015, at 09:54, Nobo Akiya <nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Tom,
> 
> Many thank you for reviewing this document.
> 
> Please see replies in-line with [NOBO].
> 
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-03
> Reviewer: Tom Taylor
> Review Date: 2015-08-21
> IETF LC End Date: 2015-09-03
> IESG Telechat date: TBD
> 
> Summary: Ready with nits. A number of missing "the"s noted but left to the RFC Editor.
> 
> 
> [NOBO] I will have one of the native English speakers go through the document to add missing "the"s.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> IDNits notes that draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping has now been published as RFC 7555.
> 
> 
> [NOBO] Thanks, I have updated the reference to RFC 7555.
> 
> Sec. 3, third line: s/carry ordered/carry an ordered/
> 
> 
> [NOBO] Accepted.
> 
> Sec. 3.2, paragraph following bullet 9:
> s/The responder LSR is to select/The responder LSR MUST (SHOULD?) select/
> Begin next sentence with "The".
> 
> [NOBO] Good comment. Yes I agree that we should use "SHOULD" here. "MUST" is probably ok, but I can see users potentially arguing for local policies to be given precedence, hence "SHOULD" is the right way to go.
> 
> I have made changes in my local copy. There is another set of review comments that came in. Once those are also addressed, I will publish the document.
> 
> Again, thank you for reviewing the document Tom!
> 
> Regards,
> Nobo
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art