[Gen-art] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-09

Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 07 January 2018 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D28126FB3; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:02:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151530495013.10736.22764279794775204@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 22:02:30 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/JpJFsKU4nyCDZw95-3504q25SoI>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2018 06:02:30 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. THis is an early review. 
Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document:draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-09
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: January 7th, 2018
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:

I have no comments about the document text. I am not a Yang expert so did not
verify the correctness of the Yang module

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: