[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Sun, 15 October 2017 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9907E132D67; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150807150359.12275.5646081426522886477@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:45:03 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/JqFZkuOfrjL8LudaTGBW--LzXYg>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 12:45:03 -0000

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2017-10-15
IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-25
IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-26

Summary: This is a well written document. There are a couple of things the
authors need to look at, but it is ready to be published

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

The authors should consider whether the 2119 boilerplate is really needed as no
RFC2119 keywords are used (something they point out to the reader) ======

       a query-based interface is used by the the I2NSF Management
       System to obatin information, whereas a report-based interface
SB Typo - obtain
=====

9.2.  Registration Categories

SB> I would think that anything in the IPFIX registry was a candidate for such
categories, after all IPFIX is designed and used  to monitor flows, often for
security reasons.