[Gen-art] IETC LC Review of draft-ietf-lmap-framework-11

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Mon, 09 March 2015 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD9E1A86EC; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 06:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S4CQD8lc3J5G; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 06:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D4D1A884F; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 06:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iecrp18 with SMTP id rp18so34852065iec.10; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 06:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rlath8y/oGTj/uAqSMPKkxEX0TA1DTo5y3E/JezzVgw=; b=js0iO7apjadVDm1u2nfAfpoQXncx1b7mqPeS4Yavo9YWT68CLZCAjr75Yv1/yQ35/n KlH0pENkbhEkYyqWNf774MboaSTRfQ7JGn6jCNpn1DWEA3v/IdPrLh9c1z+qYIvkvDS6 iCVNC6JnZiB6+XDYPBbnLzgLiB44zKFpfLX3bPSkwUkQFj3tw8UvEVHV5gmkpZRWJVhT y3tOCFKCXfVaSo1rYHOBQPnAb24j02aDZITMh8AlQbQVjEcQBjY/bHqWgByJPhATdIvF 8cxet9ZJAVsP3EG7+CPC01G2bBePKqL8PrJy2/2BcXr0s8JNPJ1lnXDTAOM5U6N1JOqs 81SQ==
X-Received: by 10.50.222.70 with SMTP id qk6mr73216286igc.47.1425906931579; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 06:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.135] (dsl-173-206-150-251.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.150.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m38sm12114189ioi.39.2015.03.09.06.15.30 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2015 06:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54FD9CF1.9070500@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:15:29 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gen Art <gen-art@ietf.org>, "EARDLEY, Phil" <philip.eardley@bt.com>, Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, marcelo@it.uc3m.es, trevor.burbridge@bt.com, paitken@brocade.com, aakhter@gmail.com, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/JxPp3iM1SeMJ_lEt0OHyBeV0_uw>
Subject: [Gen-art] IETC LC Review of draft-ietf-lmap-framework-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 13:15:34 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-lmap-framework-11
Reviewer:  Tom Taylor
Review Date: 2015/03/05
IETF LC End Date: 2015/03/09
IESG Telechat date: 2015/03/12

Summary: Beautifully written and very complete. A few editorial nits 
that could be safely ignored without affecting the utility of the document.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

Section 3, "Logging Information": s/and which/which/

Section 5, bullet 1.: not sure a protocol is trying to achieve a 
problem. Achieve a solution to a problem (solve or resolve it) or 
achieve an objective, perhaps.

Section 7, second paragraph: should delete the reference to the charter, 
since that is ephemeral information. I would rephrase as follows:
  s/similar to the protocol/just as is the protocol/