[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis-07

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 08 May 2015 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77411B2D0E; Thu, 7 May 2015 17:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XXjQ-eLKf_2d; Thu, 7 May 2015 17:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FB01A1BBD; Thu, 7 May 2015 17:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pacyx8 with SMTP id yx8so53713366pac.1; Thu, 07 May 2015 17:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ua6wqMXKLW8mrfAY/jzh91+36/ovVQ5gXE3NRxUkWoA=; b=BQYOMaYDhigQv6KTdKPBf1zuBmxrqKBxQz6MvsObOOgu/Np0D4qkDPm0PL/UgT/SMl op6QBVhE4wlK/AJOhKGMmFegz75qJuwkRqjQlSWS/njbPKdHFcqon+9K61hROp7F7Jnf Gbl6kiSwazrnFf3pjF+3p9/w9PADxXdmh3QmtHSiMJgW9qNjD8N0b9L8/l0Q5ipxz8ju IKVSyXEo9EdVvITrL2oS2wU/ZgIetRbVR9P+QWr1YHObDZB/ESVYGni5P26wYNqnj4GY uyQOUjrMlspOVI5bKKmkilIGlW1CSUcbj3EaeUASDtNCe52i8Cbo+3PzKGzF1fdfUHfq uNfg==
X-Received: by with SMTP id z7mr1942973pdj.55.1431044267071; Thu, 07 May 2015 17:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ud3sm3275948pbc.10.2015. (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 May 2015 17:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <554C00A9.4030407@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 12:17:45 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, superuser@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/KMFkH-KLp23btO07bG9zznqXiAA>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 00:17:49 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis-07.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-05-08
IETF LC End Date: 2015-05-05
IESG Telechat date: 2015-05-14

Summary: Almost ready


It seems the author didn't see my Last Call review, so this review has not changed.

As the writeup says, this is an update to a long document that mainly resolves a
notified erratum and some oversights in the previous version's IANA material.
Therefore I did not review the whole document. As far as I can tell, the changes
reflect the description in the writeup. (I assume that IANA will work with the
author to get the registry updates exactly right.)

Minor Issue:

IMHO the "Change History" section should be summarised in a "Changes since RFC7001"
section (rather than being deleted).


6.7.  SMTP Enhanced Stauts Codes