Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 08 April 2019 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFA612010E; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S30gBg2d48de; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00792120013; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44dNQY0tYxzKHt; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1554757909; bh=2nwi1IPlapTWFlw1LE1BD6kxIwsc0xL/pgql1tyj88U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=s+i9eaklm/hB1QyRyEf2xN2oiZWI82ufaig0DPHIxtrAryozxUbVqq66s1MFT2zeZ 8LV5sh1FFlJ1r0NNzyxDBC1m8G5Lw6yNQ6HypBIQSCyGGLKSjq2cY2pOfNE8OUTJCy v6VjMeRuEUNMDm5qt6jixOXHX/LGEWy2A6SvJC/Q=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXzfEfs_vyvH; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33C5B39A620; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 33C5B39A620
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271D340D358A; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Michael Sinatra <michael@brokendns.net>
cc: gen-art@ietf.org, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <67bae27f-a885-b441-63d2-fca6c7cca8e8@brokendns.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904081707440.17408@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <155454218650.21891.1515975582177931040@ietfa.amsl.com> <67bae27f-a885-b441-63d2-fca6c7cca8e8@brokendns.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Kf6kFn9vJlWpt-R2wS_joWQSbds>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 21:11:54 -0000

On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, Michael Sinatra wrote:

> On 2019-04-06 02:16, Peter Yee via Datatracker wrote:
>
>> Page 9, Section 8, 2nd paragraph: append a comma after "Hoffman".  "Imminent"
>> in this sentence is probably not the word you want in document at time of
>> publication, although it's fine to prod the named individuals into submitted
>> input prior to publication.
>
> As one of the "imminent" reviewers, I had previously had some concerns
> around some of the language of the recommendations.  The latest few
> drafts have settled those concerns, in concert with discussions with
> other folks in the WG and outside.  I think the document is ready to go,
> pending resolution of the various nits identified in the Genart review.

I will be working on all the input we got from the IESG and others. Thanks!

The word "imminent" was a joke in the draft, as it referred to people
who had promised to review the document upon adoption. A little nudge
to keep them honest. It should have been removed after the -00 version :)

Paul