Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 08 April 2019 21:11 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFA612010E;
Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id S30gBg2d48de; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00792120013;
Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44dNQY0tYxzKHt;
Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca;
s=default; t=1554757909;
bh=2nwi1IPlapTWFlw1LE1BD6kxIwsc0xL/pgql1tyj88U=;
h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
b=s+i9eaklm/hB1QyRyEf2xN2oiZWI82ufaig0DPHIxtrAryozxUbVqq66s1MFT2zeZ
8LV5sh1FFlJ1r0NNzyxDBC1m8G5Lw6yNQ6HypBIQSCyGGLKSjq2cY2pOfNE8OUTJCy
v6VjMeRuEUNMDm5qt6jixOXHX/LGEWy2A6SvJC/Q=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1])
by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NXzfEfs_vyvH; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS;
Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 33C5B39A620; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 33C5B39A620
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271D340D358A;
Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Michael Sinatra <michael@brokendns.net>
cc: gen-art@ietf.org, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <67bae27f-a885-b441-63d2-fca6c7cca8e8@brokendns.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904081707440.17408@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <155454218650.21891.1515975582177931040@ietfa.amsl.com>
<67bae27f-a885-b441-63d2-fca6c7cca8e8@brokendns.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Kf6kFn9vJlWpt-R2wS_joWQSbds>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] Genart telechat review of
draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>,
<mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>,
<mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 21:11:54 -0000
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, Michael Sinatra wrote: > On 2019-04-06 02:16, Peter Yee via Datatracker wrote: > >> Page 9, Section 8, 2nd paragraph: append a comma after "Hoffman". "Imminent" >> in this sentence is probably not the word you want in document at time of >> publication, although it's fine to prod the named individuals into submitted >> input prior to publication. > > As one of the "imminent" reviewers, I had previously had some concerns > around some of the language of the recommendations. The latest few > drafts have settled those concerns, in concert with discussions with > other folks in the WG and outside. I think the document is ready to go, > pending resolution of the various nits identified in the Genart review. I will be working on all the input we got from the IESG and others. Thanks! The word "imminent" was a joke in the draft, as it referred to people who had promised to review the document upon adoption. A little nudge to keep them honest. It should have been removed after the -00 version :) Paul
- [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dn… Peter Yee via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-iet… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] Genart telechat review of d… Michael Sinatra
- Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] Genart telechat review of d… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-iet… Paul Wouters