Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 06 February 2019 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0CA130EE9; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:51:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=EWh5HxKW; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=o+LR+Iwj
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 105ESSurNUzc; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:51:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F4185130F40; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:51:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405D220B49; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:51:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Feb 2019 16:51:43 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm2; bh=+L0RfXjAEdJ7pBRR7Ah4GyC dbC4pRqRIqk3/pj5RwVU=; b=EWh5HxKWNApd/rWka722uZROG3R3LWn0weQhA3b 2ZCR1mZfTfj2AmXt5oknsUSfQsRXSewHg+WlE9jviLVBUXK68ul+wCtvTtIB0FIc j+XluGG3sf2ETtD3eL9hMsL9mHb9Gon1koOOrjDG+2caF+9TY37Hr8qtMCGRnZdy +/i4xcnWVZponAjH3lszy68I46UBWKRGkUWHjs8uDcXbYySkxdVi0Dn2r3WepHjn +bPK/bJIp8POtIbo4dX1SBrHgSH8+DxfMjqgeLIA8OOOuu6E3hgHpxtMH8oLs8T+ 2fZXBbpttaBvwqlD9qXMnUWNNLrdPfsc5p3vI9aCGv0dHUQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=+L0RfX jAEdJ7pBRR7Ah4GyCdbC4pRqRIqk3/pj5RwVU=; b=o+LR+IwjAnp6ULadpl6Y7T dZZ9UAQVPfAC8lXeZ5La0X7dAcQ2w6OKyMemflG7CCj9mI7c+gNQRGDIUQAKHGvf Kcr90GyOnMOKGWnNsq/Gh8oGFB4sai56372UJ6+xK9VwiOOjPaYB8OP/05vVh0/u 3ZVOtC9nJVkcF1fE5C2GpxoS1h12mmKd6eMOwFGN11WlBfK4BG9ZP2nvBQs6+xrR MrPY5K833N9r/sBtTvN4WUiuVjwHH8fE1pNmbdBWn2NASGHIBh7WAItu6I6iJLEb NOtxxrIXUddSdqZ2rKC+O2hRGr7CQrJZxseFVd8i5+ETzgMPMiOo1a3p9SZ63GBw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:7lZbXGg47nNLZf5VWz_NkxK2824jOi5feYofnebr_9kQYfmHjh1X7Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrkeekgdduheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhkfgtggfuff gjvfhfofesrgdtmherhhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegr lhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgne cukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrjedvnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegr lhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:7lZbXDKjneshQ2n2A2KvWhEsgZyP36-HxfB0cAFVIsbhz72Gkx8ZSA> <xmx:7lZbXJ60H-koKvslz18l29bSjUqpQ1u9xnNnX_gr-WPrBLTGugIxYg> <xmx:7lZbXIl2ytfozIAcOwksLSCjd53nzL5TGahJSfHjKPNU9Q-AQN8BIw> <xmx:71ZbXIXgyXcebg-9MQraSos5WkB1-fq5dwNy61sU71kSHkkFhiNnaw>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.72]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A73331031B; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:51:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <C1BF6635-E38F-488A-BAB6-2A6E2A6F314B@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A69D600A-5FEE-468B-8A5C-7211CDDD5365"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:51:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxp4PEdeB06K2WmEHZbfQZVZ9PJ_1qopj9REnvW6romJSg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Dale Worley <worley@ariadne.com>, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, Erik Kline <ek=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme.all@ietf.org
To: ek@loon.co
References: <154209157324.4186.13787008047570111006@ietfa.amsl.com> <878t1w479d.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAAedzxp4PEdeB06K2WmEHZbfQZVZ9PJ_1qopj9REnvW6romJSg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/KlERghmdHVjnc082Nbshv1vrDvw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 21:51:58 -0000

Erik, thanks for your review. I entered a DISCUSS position to ask an IPR question and pointed to your review.

Alissa

> On Nov 13, 2018, at 11:53 PM, Erik Kline <ek@loon.co>; wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 20:23, Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com <mailto:worley@ariadne.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Erik Kline <ek=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; writes:
>>> Nits/editorial comments: I can't help but wonder if an example or two wouldn't
>>> round out the document.  But maybe leaptofrogans: URIs/IRIs aren't amenable to
>>> constructing an example?
>> 
>> I agree in principle with this.  Looking at reference [IFAP], here are
>> two examples:
>> 
>>    leaptofrogans:mynetwork*mysite
>>    leaptofrogans:my-network*MySite
>> 
>> The syntax of frogan addresses is very carefully specified, but most of
>> the work seems to revolve around using Unicode well:  Frogans are fully
>> internationalized, so there's a lot of work in [IFAP] specifying how to
>> use Unicode so that an address aligns with the intuitive sense of "a
>> text string".
>> 
>> But beyond the fact that a frogan address is split into two parts by a
>> "*" character, there isn't much syntax that's easily displayed by a
>> series of ASCII examples.
> 
> I understand about the limitations of the current RFC format w.r.t.
> non-ASCII characters (but I suspect you wouldn't want to wait for the
> new format to be readily available :-).
> 
> FWIW I think those two examples would be perfectly fine.  They may not
> seem overly expressive or especially illustrative, but including them
> might scratch an itch for some readers.
> 
> But it's certainly not anything worth holding up publication for, IMHO.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>