From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Alexey Melnikov
 <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>,
 "draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org"
 <draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQCMeOg+EJYL3onkq6AD/kNhZNZZxyAegAgAO+oGA=
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:03:06 +0000
Message-ID: <E0F7A68B07B53F4FBD12DABD61CBA90E12809572@ESESSMB307.ericsson.se>
References: <53DAB481.6080709@nostrum.com> <53DE8F7B.6040309@isode.com>
 <ADE718DA-7071-43EE-B0A4-7A1EF77D4124@ericsson.com>
 <54752264.6020103@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54752264.6020103@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/L7s9tHLhXc4z-cIeKbrgQM3yBoI
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt
Precedence: list

Hi Spencer and all,

I was basking for a moment (the moment was very long) hence late in reply..=
.

Thanks for the reviews. We will try to address the comments from IESG evalu=
ation and Alexey in the next version (hopefully next week).

BR

Zahed

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 26 november 2014 01:44
> To: Alexey Melnikov; draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: Jari Arkko; gen-art@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.t=
xt
>=20
> On 11/25/2014 09:50 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> > Thanks for the review. (Were the comments adopted by the authors? This
> > review is from August, but I cannot see a response...)
>=20
> So, just to update the RMCAT crew, this document was approved on today's
> telechat, pending comment disposition.
>=20
> On the comments from Alexey's review - the term RMCAT doesn't appear in t=
he
> text, but still appears in the short title on each page, so his comment o=
n
> expanding/explaining RMCAT still applies. RTP and RTCP now do have
> references, so that comment has been handled.
>=20
> In addition, there were IESG evaluation comments from several ADs. The
> comments from Brian and Barry were intended for me and the other ADs, so =
no
> action required, but the other comments at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements/ballot/
> should be considered. You should bask for a moment in the compliment Ted
> included in his ballot.
>=20
> Please let me know if/when you have a revised ID, and I'll send the appro=
val
> note to the secretariat.
>=20
> And thanks for all your work on this.
>=20
> Spencer, as responsible AD
>=20
> > Jari
> >
> > On 03 Aug 2014, at 21:37, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> >>
> >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >>
> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> >> you may receive.
> >>
> >> Document: draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05
> >> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
> >> Review Date: 3-Aug-2014
> >> IETF LC End Date: 13-Aug-2014
> >> IESG Telechat date: N/A
> >>
> >> Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational
> >> RFC [ready with comments]
> >>
> >> Major issues: None
> >> Minor issues:
> >>
> >> In Section 1: RMCAT is not explained/expanded, when mentioned for the =
first
> time. Does this acronym need to be in the published RFC, e.g. would it be=
 useful
> for readers reading this document 10 years later?
> >>
> >> RTP and RTCP need references.
> >>
> >> In general, I found this document not to be very friendly to people wh=
o don't
> follow RMCAT.
> >>
> >> Nits/editorial comments: None
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gen-art mailing list
> >> Gen-art@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art