[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Wed, 11 April 2012 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECE011E80AD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGEewBWzRmDC for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DEB11E8079 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q3B36fxx001712; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:06:43 -0500
Received: from [164.48.125.29] (147.117.20.214) by smtps-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.20.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:06:35 -0400
Message-ID: <4F84F535.5090502@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:06:29 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0.all@tools.ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:06:56 -0000

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2012/04/10
IESG Telechat date: 2012/04/12

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Standard but it
has some issues.

Substantive:

* Section 6.1.2

The draft defines a new option space for the OPT option codes. It is not
clear who allocates and maintains these. Section 7 seems to talk about
what seems to be a well known IANA policy definition ("Expert Review")
but there is no directive to the IANA to create a new options registry
in the IANA considerations section. Please clarify.

Minor:

* Section 5:

This sentence does not read right the way it is written. It is probably
missing a negative.

OLD:
Extended Label Types are difficult to use due to support in clients
and intermediate gateways...

Propose replacing with

NEW:
Extended Label Types are difficult to use due to the lack of support in
clients and intermediate gateways...


Thanks
Suresh