Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-11

[Ketan Talaulikar <[e-mail]>]

Hi Reese,

Thanks for your review. We've fixed the nits that you advertised in the
latest version of the draft that has just been posted.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-12

Thanks,
Ketan


On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:04 AM Reese Enghardt via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-11
> Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
> Review Date: 2023-05-10
> IETF LC End Date: 2023-05-15
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary: The document is clear, concise, and well-written. It is ready for
> publication as a Proposed Standard.
>
> Major issues: None.
>
> Minor issues: None.
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> 5. SRv6 SIDs and Reachability
> "if the locator associated with SRv6 SID advertisements is the longest
>    prefix match installed in the forwarding plane for those SIDs"
>
> Please capitalize the beginning of the paragraph
>
> 9. Advertisement of SRv6 SIDs Associated with Adjacencies
>
> "although it MAY omit doing so if features like traffic engineering or
>    Topology-Independent Loop Free Alternate (TI-LFA) that requires it
>    are not in use"
> requires -> require?
> I'm not 100% sure what "it" refers to, but I'll assume it refers to a
> unique
> SRv6 End.X SID.
>
> The HTML version of the document looks different from most other recent
> documents. Was the most recent tooling used here? If not, please consider
> updating the XML format or tooling.
>
>
>