IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-15

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 23 September 2020 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB3F3A1217; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=FKlkFDje; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=GpfsdUIy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXb6aufxHaf8; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1207F3A1201; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED415C0134; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:06:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:06:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm1; bh=zY8y5TgZxkNrey9QPCvLqnJ QPfyCI9irOqjE03v5PlY=; b=FKlkFDjekZCQeapikWLupZeqMLdI3iUtbnOWIMP YP43pcgBBDpYantqYzGsoSkK68FnB9ZSXBr/MwAKPnndSNVxYAcYTFVtA2BzYGg6 1z7PQpLLq+25ncReNgH/DqENps3QpLzu9al4O+79NQkzZU4E2mj13iW05WMSMduu ffEHQ1gQYayWqrkghq1ROFAXVFJHU7U3uBheZRjnR2yy3vCCNmzsAq6OKwDtIbMo +o8v+mZAv052cdoKSg13kxOUAJNjLLTxJFxQ2FBvNtJEdmebOMmxiVPocmHAyRi4 4Q7GJ8EgnCknxbeLX3wpEhnUMAoD+oB4W5+eR0fZNNFo6Pg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=zY8y5T gZxkNrey9QPCvLqnJQPfyCI9irOqjE03v5PlY=; b=GpfsdUIy0cS0OpTF8Nbyni cVudzTpxJama2m2za6JW8KjgwvaIT5PG2FYiI/kI/Nb0mLa+lztZQ9udTq276aqY A0on5KIQYFVtBJhZEPioA1F2zJX7b8zb9EwTHDZJZMu0yd8FBgfYRC4vFpppyaVU ltYqn8Iz9Iz2TJ9nWepvResFOsx0bG29dz6sJFioecj/Atv8VErf2ZDHDDT6Es6u zbh/UlxIAjjgUDtPmq2vPRKCHPmXY41q3xyLHVVE0UUY4tN7M5NkDBZVDqa2YsIH Cdh4wgWR03Od1bnu7Tak+BSV5WwCPlTCrtqnVm5OVQy1wWyO9375eHExs5gbqwFw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:m3JrX8P25hJCC8aVtCLTVOuf1VGbtTn5FSJlGlAtlyjD-pCyppxiRg> <xme:m3JrXy9fxGv_Ysvw5lndHvn_e03ygPlTazmfG3bunbCIMpKvMGUlOaLv7dvjxKxcD WjHJcdHwVcCTU-2oA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeigdelkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhkfgtggfuffgjvfhfofesrgdtmherhhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgr ucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeggefffeduvdfffeelgfehkedtiefghefftdetteeifeefhfefudegudeuvdev hfenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedutdekrdehuddruddtuddrle eknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghl ihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:m3JrXzQZ1chH9lIx808T6DRiy5L0KA1XEGhKq-1iBOS2xZ2fCiEMwA> <xmx:m3JrX0vfM5CFUZPxcab7CYhEikI2LZENdC6rLPA0VyWMiqhG_U4vOQ> <xmx:m3JrX0c5GyAAAmh6_S7HhEUwB0aYpcy18ENbnQ3evaWQA5f-nQG23g> <xmx:nHJrXz6CplBe9iEgp-nBcc7b8qEkRkgPm_aqr6uG9LFmLEOgTEyRwQ>
Received: from alcoop-m-c46z.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-101-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.101.98]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 526243280065; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:06:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <74859504-CAB0-4DC3-BE87-9E8185E94F0F@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_041F4C61-346C-4654-9ADB-D89826E4596D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:06:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAMMTW_L33v50vPupJT-fviqWQNap5B1tAE71GfsAHS8DOnQfag@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, last-call@ietf.org, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>, "gen-art >> General area reviewing team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, regext@ietf.org, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging.all@ietf.org
To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
References: <159753241794.3282.10287963728007886569@ietfa.amsl.com> <d07ed430-219a-0435-789b-03378c41fc91@iit.cnr.it> <CALaySJKXQfNVnQYQ0c1PTZbRd1-K7eHe6z0878ZddxEVB703CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMTW_L33v50vPupJT-fviqWQNap5B1tAE71GfsAHS8DOnQfag@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Lbh-GQrGUwm0u47e12D4yuel6N0>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:06:58 -0000

Vijay, thanks for your review. Mario, Barry, thanks for your responses aand the new appendix. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Aug 18, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:57 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org <mailto:barryleiba@computer.org>> wrote:
> Hi, Mario and Vijay.
> 
> 7942 says that the Implementation Status section is inappropriate to include in an RFC because it’s transient information that changes, and is usually obsolete quickly.
> 
> But I don’t interpret Vijay’s suggestion as asking you to leave the section in the document in it’s entirety, but, rather, to put non-ephemeral information about a reference implementation into an appendix.  If there’s a stable implementation that can be used in that way, I think it would be appropriate, and I agree with Vijay that it could be helpful to other implementors to have that information available.
> 
> Dear Barry and Mario: Thanks for paying attention to my review, and Barry is indeed correct.  
> 
> Especially that the two implementations listed in the implementation section appear to be almost fully conformant to the draft, and also appear to have reasonable documentation, etc. around them.  It would seem to be a waste of code to simply take this section out without preserving the good work done here that can get other implementers started immediately.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> - vijay
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email