Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 28 May 2015 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8773F1A87D2 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 03:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o3VnNE4VN49S for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 03:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD9C1A87CD for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 03:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048752CC5A; Thu, 28 May 2015 13:31:40 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f60rtncYnYbq; Thu, 28 May 2015 13:31:39 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300142CC49; Thu, 28 May 2015 13:31:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_018AD787-F32D-4CE1-A420-FEC237C295E6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936449E0A@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:31:39 +0300
Message-Id: <15D3F2F8-C183-4D31-A10D-23B595565105@piuha.net>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936449E0A@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/MHHI_1HV7fKSsbi-NGuOgEU_wNw>
Cc: "General Area Review Team \(gen-art@ietf.org\)" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr" <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "fred@cisco.com" <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:31:43 -0000

Thanks for your review, David.

Jari

On 21 Apr 2015, at 02:54, Black, David <david.black@emc.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
> Reviewer: David Black
> Review Date: April 20, 2015
> IETF LC End Date: April 20, 2015
> 
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
> 	should be fixed before publication.
> 
> This is a short crisp draft on behavior of CIDR prefixes in IPv6 forwarding
> with respect to the /64 boundary in IPv6 addresses.  It's clear, well explained
> easy to understand, plus refreshingly short.  Nicely done!
> 
> Major issues: (none)
> 
> Minor issues: (none)
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: Ok, I found a nit ... and so did idnits ;-).
> 
> -- Abstract
> 
>   Hardware and software
>   algorithms should therefore impose no rules on prefix length, but
>   implement longest-match-first on prefixes of any valid length.
> 
> "algorithms" isn't the right word.
> I suggest "implementations of routing and forwarding"
> 
> idnits pointed out that: A later version (-06) exists of
>     draft-ietf-opsec-v6-05
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
>