Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01

[Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for your review, David.

Jari

On 21 Apr 2015, at 02:54, Black, David <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
> Reviewer: David Black
> Review Date: April 20, 2015
> IETF LC End Date: April 20, 2015
> 
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
> 	should be fixed before publication.
> 
> This is a short crisp draft on behavior of CIDR prefixes in IPv6 forwarding
> with respect to the /64 boundary in IPv6 addresses.  It's clear, well explained
> easy to understand, plus refreshingly short.  Nicely done!
> 
> Major issues: (none)
> 
> Minor issues: (none)
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: Ok, I found a nit ... and so did idnits ;-).
> 
> -- Abstract
> 
>   Hardware and software
>   algorithms should therefore impose no rules on prefix length, but
>   implement longest-match-first on prefixes of any valid length.
> 
> "algorithms" isn't the right word.
> I suggest "implementations of routing and forwarding"
> 
> idnits pointed out that: A later version (-06) exists of
>     draft-ietf-opsec-v6-05
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> [phone]             FAX: [phone]
> [e-mail]        Mobile: [phone]
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
>