Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_018AD787-F32D-4CE1-A420-FEC237C295E6";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936449E0A@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:31:39 +0300
Message-Id: <15D3F2F8-C183-4D31-A10D-23B595565105@piuha.net>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936449E0A@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/MHHI_1HV7fKSsbi-NGuOgEU_wNw>
Cc: "General Area Review Team \(gen-art@ietf.org\)" <gen-art@ietf.org>,
 "alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr" <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>,
 "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>,
 "fred@cisco.com" <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
Precedence: list


--Apple-Mail=_018AD787-F32D-4CE1-A420-FEC237C295E6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1

Thanks for your review, David.

Jari

On 21 Apr 2015, at 02:54, Black, David <david.black@emc.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>=20
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>=20
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>=20
> Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
> Reviewer: David Black
> Review Date: April 20, 2015
> IETF LC End Date: April 20, 2015
>=20
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits =
that
> 	should be fixed before publication.
>=20
> This is a short crisp draft on behavior of CIDR prefixes in IPv6 =
forwarding
> with respect to the /64 boundary in IPv6 addresses.  It's clear, well =
explained
> easy to understand, plus refreshingly short.  Nicely done!
>=20
> Major issues: (none)
>=20
> Minor issues: (none)
>=20
> Nits/editorial comments: Ok, I found a nit ... and so did idnits ;-).
>=20
> -- Abstract
>=20
>   Hardware and software
>   algorithms should therefore impose no rules on prefix length, but
>   implement longest-match-first on prefixes of any valid length.
>=20
> "algorithms" isn't the right word.
> I suggest "implementations of routing and forwarding"
>=20
> idnits pointed out that: A later version (-06) exists of
>     draft-ietf-opsec-v6-05
>=20
> Thanks,
> --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ----------------------------------------------------
>=20
>=20


--Apple-Mail=_018AD787-F32D-4CE1-A420-FEC237C295E6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=42I1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_018AD787-F32D-4CE1-A420-FEC237C295E6--