Re: [Gen-art] Review tool issue - email From

"A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com> Mon, 05 December 2016 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mahoney@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C781A129508 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 06:52:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mnAqP900mxmS for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 06:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC2BA12950E for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 06:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mutabilis-2.local ([47.186.56.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uB5EqaNL007131 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 08:52:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mahoney@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.56.40] claimed to be mutabilis-2.local
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <148090444981.5523.17374875997079514429.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2b8ba5ea-abbe-9448-c1ae-2015bf41fdcc@gmail.com>
From: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <df15c0f5-56f9-822a-5782-0df5c81a96bb@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 08:52:36 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2b8ba5ea-abbe-9448-c1ae-2015bf41fdcc@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/N98BHtsjLQlX48Ry-lGgjCL-du4>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review tool issue - email From
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:52:42 -0000

A ticket has been opened on this issue:

https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/2078

Thank you for pointing that issue out, Brian.

Jean

On 12/4/16 8:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> IMHO there's an important problem with the new tool: the review arrives
> with
>
> To: "General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-whatever.all@ietf.org
>
> So, if anybody just does Reply, it goes to ietf-secretariat-reply
> which is presumably /dev/null, and if they do Reply All it will only
> reach the reviewer via the list.
>
> The From is very unfortunate.
>
>     Brian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>