[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14

Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 17 June 2018 06:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D96130E7C; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152921687734.2071.3843497811933571200@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:27:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/NMwAGEjsQOUD-BAsiqIUj5AysMI>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 06:27:58 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-06-16
IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-28
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.
I was just wondering why it went from  version -10 to -14

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: