Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07

["Miguel A. Garcia" <[e-mail]>]

Zhen,

The issue with IANA is double:

On one side, you need to clearly indicate to IANA which registry they 
need to change.

On another side, someone reading this RFC should be able to go to 
www.iana.org and find the registry.

The solve both issues you don't need a reference to RFC 5295. What you 
need to say "Extended Master Session Key (EMSK) Parameters registry" in 
the IANA considerations section, because this is the official name by 
which the registry is known.

BR,

          Miguel

On 03/02/2012 8:11, Zhen Cao wrote:
>> >
>> >  - Another topic, Section 9 (IANA Considerations) reads:
>> >
>> >     Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label
>> >     from the "USRK Key Labels" name space with a value:
>> >
>> >        EAP Early-Authentication [e-mail]
>> >
>> >
>> >  I am missing the sentence to name the master registry where the USRK Key
>> >  Labels subregistry is stored. This is the Extended Master Session Key (EMSK)
>> >  Parameters registry (I guess). And probably this comment is also valid for
>> >  the rest of the IANA actions: the main registry is not named, and it is hard
>> >  to find it.
> [CZ]: EMSK or DSRK lable is defined in the section 8.1 "Key Lables" of
> RFC5295. We will add reference to RFC5295 to fix this. Thanks.
>
>> >

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia
[phone]
Ericsson Spain