IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 21 April 2015 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692C81A876C; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRbvl4lZfcie; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D21E1A8758; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t3LKL9J1078824 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:21:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <5536B130.7000707@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:21:04 -0500
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis@ietf.org, precis@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Nf4Yqz9ZuTGMHy1_53oKty_mq8w>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:21:15 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 21Apr2015
IETF LC End Date: 28Apr2015
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled

Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard with one minor nit

This is a very easy to read document for such a detail-rich protocol.

Nit:

The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of 
strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with 
LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email 
addresses (or strings that look just like them) are discussed as valid 
examples of usernames.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email