IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-05

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Fri, 12 February 2021 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34663A17CD; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:04:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MNGE3Cg8Pkx7; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:04:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1333A17C4; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049295.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049295.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11CH0D7L027252; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:04:31 -0500
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049295.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 36nwpjr46v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:04:31 -0500
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 11CH4TLg097850; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:04:30 -0600
Received: from zlp30496.vci.att.com (zlp30496.vci.att.com [135.46.181.157]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 11CH4QG9097767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:04:26 -0600
Received: from zlp30496.vci.att.com (zlp30496.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30496.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 1E534403A428; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:04:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clph811.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.107.12]) by zlp30496.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id F1BA8403A424; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:04:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clph811.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 11CH4Pxj068676; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:04:25 -0600
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.178.11]) by clph811.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 11CH4JtS068367; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:04:20 -0600
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njmtcas1.research.att.com [135.207.255.86]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE1D10A18D6; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:04:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njmtcas1.research.att.com ([fe80::e881:676b:51b6:905d%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:04:33 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method.all@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-05
Thread-Index: AQHXAVVRNjuS2FwTcEuRLohtdMrgwapUtPyg
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:04:33 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF014769BD6A@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <161314437215.27849.15366890249325519802@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161314437215.27849.15366890249325519802@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [24.148.42.167]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-12_05:2021-02-12, 2021-02-12 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102120127
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/OC8dMdoLt-lXYQ8mqCtURu4qp0g>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:04:43 -0000

Thanks for your review, Stewart!

please see reply below,
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 10:40 AM
...
> Summary: A well written text ready for publication
[acm] 
Thanks!
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 8.4.  Running Code
> 
>    This section is for the benefit of the Document Shepherd's form, and
>    will be deleted prior to final review.
> 
> SB> I am wondering if this was supposed to be deleted before this review,
> or whether you plan to keep it?
[acm] 
Yes, we'll certainly delete this section before the RFC Editors see it. However,
there is a lot of review yet to happen. I really don't mind if the IESG
sees it in some form, but we don't want to risk endorsing one implementation, IIRC.

Also, this material could move to the Doc Shepherd's form, but has not yet:
	Document Quality:

	Are there existing implementations of the protocol? ...

I see that we need to update the reference in section 8.4:
OLD
[udpst]    AT&T, "UDP Speed Test Open Broadband project", August
              2020, <https://github.com/BroadbandForum <TBD>>.
NEW
[udpst]    udpst Project Collaborators, "UDP Speed Test Open Broadband project", 
              December 2020, <https://github.com/BroadbandForum/obudpst>.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email