IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 06 February 2019 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8622E124B0C; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 23:21:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=PpmgvjhU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Zm/ztANa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aops4KNRTLhz; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 23:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEBD3123FFD; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 23:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B06C221DC; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 02:21:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Feb 2019 02:21:35 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=/ PvqebCuy7vtyYBNm0CSzezJpnZK95W6fXo9qrUz5dY=; b=PpmgvjhUTnmxr0YNz ij7sWfGDz1gI6Giy2lhnuOhTb+4fYJ0mUHymj5OPpWHYOYeaPhPr7XVFelO+K2JD pJYiGVOZL7TuxTiJVBbzxIiVsMPn4Zg+w8Xr4x6rtrox3Jb8aDQjmszLVBgSo7cJ h2QbBc1yTJs/LvYSPrg8B0mXEQz5j6Spd8XJTRUbUv8PaU0atmQa1eAcJW4NG0oQ I8PRZlX3IGFrNR4p4yNFS9MpdvWK8V/x5r7ArGqvg3ylIabupeApcVm9JZ0oCHsc qN+fstMAZTnw/pzl6K/A2Ykr+Yb3GqVlTGr4TTCLo/OLHiBJxd7qzkzP+rXtYRnH rznGA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=/PvqebCuy7vtyYBNm0CSzezJpnZK95W6fXo9qrUz5 dY=; b=Zm/ztANaE/T3P4YptqN3o327bmKFnG38HZRF8lTs/jAlngkRWBzArJlab g3UUVzMQnuTw17Q+YD30uwoXTrFJfsRKePgUR2GJF5BAuhfbXlr5zug7I6pR7V0U yUTd+wkUvmX2m8a6qSN5HgSVsH7SHjvtrqJrZvRbSKG7QK0WR9c1rvEzXDcGiUBU HMGSbhny/gZ4VBAE/veSxlf5Mp8SFlaE4eUZf4jMD9YfsO7SEUoz4qO83jTVTlWi P9/TbmpHuqwNc2iXS/RBCi6gW7H3TjfMew010O4tJ5ZJHHLxmuySXJNwQ57oBMM9 49rBLzu4nWRRUtps/V16VKyCZk0pg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_opaXGD4tyXqpGJb0sSK7lEUnK2bu35fC8hA1X__KK3PkiYVCrbCIg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrkeejgddutdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjff fgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghm uceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthdpih grnhgrrdhorhhgnecukfhppedugeegrddufeeirddujeehrddvkeenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:_opaXLIwexJppFlLVyYblQ3CjOkxDplhPI8CupFSRGt2uhDNYy1NqA> <xmx:_opaXPld7d1HdEmIvhg40EoJ3KTSqQ5-1LqOOGYbBQ8_uyB4YRR9AQ> <xmx:_opaXEa1ERn5GoYdcSr5b_4Ypb4L-qVH0jYiqDEa3xf-uNA51PjUeA> <xmx:_4paXBe0R_dM1VykvaLYIuBmjlzocQ23vasdbIQ0yrtSviI1y9VkDw>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 74985100E5; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 02:21:32 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <154943705913.32195.5767358135257812709@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:21:27 +1100
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8B8FB951-B356-412B-B81E-F64AF28400F4@mnot.net>
References: <154943705913.32195.5767358135257812709@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/OVUUgKzwT1XIifXOoTaXH8jg0Uo>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:21:40 -0000

Hi Erik!

> On 6 Feb 2019, at 6:10 pm, Erik Kline <ek@google.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> [1] I assume the URIs in 6.3 are also meant to be deleted upon publication?

Not all of them; just the ones referenced from the section that's marked for deletion.


> [2] WRT to the final lines of 5.1:
> 
>    [a] "Replace all references to RFC 5988 in that registry have been
>    replaced..." doesn't scan well, I think.
> 
>    [b] If the IANA repo in question is
>    https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml, I
>    don't see any mention of 5988 in there.

That's been removed since, as a result of another review.


> [3] Naive question: do we want a statement about reserving/agreeing to never
> allocate "example" in the .well-known space?

Good question! I'm neutral on this; does anyone have strong feelings?

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email