Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-10

Thanks Alissa.

kind regards
X

2018-04-03 20:00 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>:

> Brian, thanks for your reviews. Authors, thanks for addressing Brian’s
> comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.
>
> Alissa
>
> > On Mar 31, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The published -11 text is even better than the proposal below.
> >
> > Thanks
> >   Brian Carpenter
> >
> > On 23/03/2018 08:10, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >> That looks good to me. I think it will help implementers.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>   Brian Carpenter
> >>
> >> On 22/03/2018 21:41, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen wrote:
> >>> Dear Brian,
> >>>
> >>> after the WG meeting we proceed to resolve your pointed issue. Thanks
> so
> >>> much for going through the draft again.
> >>>
> >>> We will publish v11 with the following update on the text as you
> suggested.
> >>> We hope this clarifies your point.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In section 3.1.1.  2-step 6P Transaction
> >>> we added:
> >>> Race conditions MAY happen when a timeout expires while a 6P
> >>>       Response is on the air.  Other inconsistencies can also happen
> >>>       when the last L2 ACK for a 6P Response is lost or when one of the
> >>>       nodes is power cycled.  6P provides an inconsistency detection
> >>>       mechanism described in Section 3.4.6.1 to cope with such
> >>>       situations.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In section 3.1.2.  3-step 6P Transaction
> >>> we added:
> >>>  Race conditions MAY happen when a timeout expires while a 6P
> >>>       Confirmation is on the air.  Other inconsistencies can also
> >>>       happen when the last L2 ACK for a 6P Confirmation is lost or when
> >>>       one of the nodes is power cycled.  6P provides an inconsistency
> >>>       detection mechanism described in Section 3.4.6.1 to cope with
> >>>       such situations.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> kind regards
> >>> Xavi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2018-03-11 4:11 GMT+01:00 Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>
> >>>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> >>>> Review result: Ready
> >>>>
> >>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> >>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> >>>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> >>>> like any other last call comments.
> >>>>
> >>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >>>>
> >>>> Document: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-10
> >>>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> >>>> Review Date: 2018-03-10
> >>>> IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-26
> >>>> IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05
> >>>>
> >>>> Summary: Ready
> >>>>
> >>>> Comment:
> >>>>
> >>>> Most of my previous comments have been fixed, thanks. I still disagree
> >>>> with the authors on one point, but not enough to delay the draft:
> >>>>
> >>>> In section 3.1.1 "2-step 6P Transaction" there seems to be a rare race
> >>>> condition
> >>>> if A's timeout expires while B's Response is in flight. This will be
> >>>> detected
> >>>> later as an inconsistency (section 3.4.6.2). The authors don't think
> it's
> >>>> necessary
> >>>> to mention this in 3.1.1. IMHO it would be useful to mention.
> (Similarly
> >>>> for
> >>>> section 3.1.2, 3-step transaction.)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gen-art mailing list
> > Gen-art@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>
>

-- 
Dr. Xavier Vilajosana
Wireless Networks Lab

*Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)Professor*
(+34) 646 633 681
xvilajosana@uoc.edu <usuari@uoc.edu>
http://xvilajosana.org
http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu
Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia
Av Carl Friedrich Gauss 5, B3 Building
08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona). Catalonia. Spain
[image: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya]