Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 07 March 2019 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B4D128CF2; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:49:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=sahQnB9g; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=OFlDAzCU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BIyp1Yc3fHHw; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52282130E13; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6AF2469C; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 22:49:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Mar 2019 22:49:56 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=p VBtkMMjlr1gj+5Ruilf0acq+HURwEr63wXee7hEdvs=; b=sahQnB9gEIbehPC3i FFlN6T+KZFJNNBLYhK+RCEpyVKiXxAv8swkKpa81fsjXbN1JDMYb4QltGaKzSqle vYwMzItHaTlIqfueRBrqFN89elwqyCF4bD9TUp+oI7ZCDYex8ejXXBTpWE1O4d/A qmdCt+Xy5ypkqdZfVpGvh5/ao0LnaSvatVoMsUaByeyyFoIyJ/ZI6U1FiShTRfaB ps4dWx+3VnSNl1B/U4dzs7rLL6h1aIl5pjtk4Iuo0AQf8fbzwejnLS4PySP5YhOa ge0kSxmbv08M7S5U37eSV+O5g+n0Xrpp4k7AJuZ8HJQscOrLjo6uBGW0Cx9Z2ykN VTzgw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pVBtkMMjlr1gj+5Ruilf0acq+HURwEr63wXee7hEd vs=; b=OFlDAzCUexwuDV5D5aZv5QxOmteJMsD3/F9hXdGGJjPw32PObhxaf+I0J +PjdJjY9lVCbdXZ/GmTM8Bf/jdN/XiHBFspv5afpDrhM7WPOFY2wX6EHo6fM73/d hJbMeihLwhGnnjPREOpPg9EPp/3o74h0NTDsbFQ1gqh6Wys3byRJ5ioGDaeuphp8 VHW/hP1qPd6A0nMB89s2J7BWdlrja82PpVAnv20RXOjHPvqK9wftQtIagj+enmFE qOFTH6snu00138m/mGOJVi6JWL5BMyP/LnUi+nwDEJpjQ7zB4TRUoFQlOC1/krgS OVtLVVzBjN8tHps4DPRW0rqV+MBCA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:45SAXOEdHVFO07c7K91OP2DgV1B1o-ln36oq3ClcznkUO5PuI2gLVQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrfeejgdeigecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmh dthhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestgho ohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrd efkedruddujedrjeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestgho ohhpvghrfidrihhnnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:45SAXG86hM9v9fNCPoh-HsffUqnDQWYgR9qlLqw_DQbgYuOH8MC-Ig> <xmx:45SAXFyWidasSHwgbANB7jnNGctTsadzA8JdO2dD2zPtVr46FfliUQ> <xmx:45SAXCNrCO67g_UpdrvkvyxEfxD6rVG8BKAjQRwTJw2RnbC2JaQ5iQ> <xmx:5JSAXNLBTm0k74Yf0yJn6A5K7j9qW4gMgtKB2XC-f6o2_m6Hsvoc-g>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.74]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 50244E465D; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 22:49:55 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <155190156462.14265.15045150044940680974@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 22:49:53 -0500
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, rmcat@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CDFBDEC0-56A0-4701-94D9-95C02C6E5B2C@cooperw.in>
References: <155190156462.14265.15045150044940680974@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Datatracker on behalf of Stewart Bryant <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/PCy75VCEDqorueAEIOU1n1GofZg>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 03:49:59 -0000

Stewart, thanks for your reviews. Zahed, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot. I think the limitations for controlled environments are described clearly enough.

Alissa

> On Mar 6, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Datatracker on behalf of Stewart Bryant <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2019-03-06
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-02-11
> IESG Telechat date: 2019-03-07
> 
> Summary:
> 
> I remain concerned as to whether the advice regarding the use of these tests on
> or in proximity to production networks is strict enough,
> 
> Major issues:
> Although the security section has been revised since my review of -08, I remain
> concerned as to whether the advice against testing of production networks is
> strict enough.
> 
> I know that performance testing on production networks has given problems in
> the past, and this is really no different.
> 
> The OPS and SEC ADs should satisfy themselves as to whether the new text is
> adequate in this regards.
> 
> Minor issues: none
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
>  ** There are 6 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one
>     being 4 characters in excess of 72.
> 
>  ** The document seems to lack a both a reference to RFC 2119 and the
>     recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119
>     keywords.
> 
>     RFC 2119 keyword, line 458: '...didate proposals MAY show the effectiv...'
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art