Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-02

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 22 October 2015 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FD41A88ED; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hynNMVNr71vo; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F0C1A8924; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985E02CCD0; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:25:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6MLfFyDIYHw; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:25:03 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BAB2CC6B; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:25:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C7501402-8D70-493D-9B39-D23C589399F7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <3A8E6F3E-5C22-42A5-BE98-02CB178D5687@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:25:01 +0100
Message-Id: <40565B64-2BD9-4520-A0AA-8B5CAD422A47@piuha.net>
References: <3A8E6F3E-5C22-42A5-BE98-02CB178D5687@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/PGj45gO8Wx-x3QaO7PeQYroct18>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, aqm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:25:08 -0000

Thanks for the review, Pete. Authors, did you have any responses to the points that Pete is making?

FWIW, I think that the algorithm/queue empty and WRR issues need a fix, and I also agree with Pete on RFC/author name reference issue,

Jari