Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-04

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 17 December 2015 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657D61B2C9D for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:11:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKojMr82Uf_0 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884E91B2C9F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:10:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC5C2CCBF; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:10:58 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92a1u0jGl4VT; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:10:58 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8DE2CCAE; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:10:58 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_25614A67-24DA-495C-92B2-BDB4B2D311AF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A454A5755@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:10:58 +0200
Message-Id: <3111B7F8-364E-4D48-9754-F3CE03934C9A@piuha.net>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A454A53DB@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1512022154590.26829@multics.mit.edu> <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A454A5755@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/P_sR6mJ6nFWGSSHHOGzp_bnWs9M>
Cc: "draft-ietf-kitten-cammac.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-kitten-cammac.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:11:01 -0000

Thanks for your review, Meral. FWIW, I often find myself
struggling with “service” used in different contexts, but
I’ll defer to Benjamin on how well any changes would
fit in the Kerberos terminology and environment…

Jari

On 03 Dec 2015, at 06:25, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>  Thank you for considering, I read it from the eyes of someone new to the document, and perhaps ref [MS-SFU] caused the doubts. I agree that for people following the work this is probably obvious:) Since it is a Standards document I think it will clarify a lot if the same term is used across the document; you are probably a better judge on that.
> 
> Best,
> Meral
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:kaduk@MIT.EDU]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 6:57 PM
>> To: Meral Shirazipour
>> Cc: draft-ietf-kitten-cammac.all@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-
>> kitten-cammac.all@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-04
>> 
>> Hi Meral,
>> 
>> Thank you for the review.
>> 
>> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Meral Shirazipour wrote:
>> 
>>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>> 
>>> [Page 3] 2nd and 3rd paragraph: The word "service" is used to
>>> designate both the proxy-service and the second backend
>>> "application-service" as per [MS-SFU]. This may confuse the reader at first
>> read.
>>> Suggestion would be to use "proxy-service" and "application-service".
>>> [Page 8] after point "2." would also benefit from clearer use of these
>>> terms.
>> 
>> From the point of view of the Kerberos protocol, there is only one service
>> here, so I think it is appropriate to use only a single term.
>> 
>>> [Page 8], last paragraph, it was not clear to me if "service principal"
>>> is the "application service"?
>> 
>> "service principal name" is the identifier used to represent the application
>> service within the Kerberos protocol, yes.
>> 
>> I am not sure if I should recommend that the authors make any changes to
>> reduce the potential for confusion.
>> 
>> -Ben Kaduk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art