Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 26 May 2015 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C901A872E; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6wxSRRpn0nIi; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217D91A8724; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF2A2CC6F; Tue, 26 May 2015 14:44:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5WDn4x-F2Rt; Tue, 26 May 2015 14:44:50 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA802CC49; Tue, 26 May 2015 14:44:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3DC8FADE-0A68-47BF-B48D-668DDCF31B93"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <55379C22.2030708@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 14:44:50 +0300
Message-Id: <96B1D785-87D3-4B0A-AB4D-E21254F6D708@piuha.net>
References: <5536B130.7000707@nostrum.com> <55377D03.4040904@isode.com> <55379C22.2030708@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/PmEpsMw1_j42C4cTGJnzw2b9o2U>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:44:53 -0000

Thanks for the review & edits, Robert, Alexey, and Peter.

Jari

On 22 Apr 2015, at 16:03, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 4/22/15 5:50 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>> 
>> On 21/04/2015 21:21, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>> Nit:
>>> 
>>> The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email addresses (or strings that look just like them) are discussed as valid examples of usernames.
>> Email address like things are commonly used as usernames, but strictly speaking they are 2 different types of objects. How do you think we can make this clearer?
> I don't think drawing the distinction helps the document. Peter's suggestion wfm.
>