Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 30 January 2018 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2306B12E86A; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:54:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=BHDAJwbZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=pldAeoye
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7OROmtOhuRFu; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B20E120454; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E7120C99; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:54:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:54:28 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=INhXBTCrzNviKJgVwskxfaeDdbRcr XtMRJV7pEcRcks=; b=BHDAJwbZCILflhCWonG99AzXQBG09uJbfH8rCj0juhB7e boMJjMucCnBYODNg1eyE+jW+EAowJYsvrJPQEXNL/Tfe32w00p9eGe1/ms1rk2At TLNPVhH/l6CyY6d/cpgZHjkikEnrt1VeBCQW7PBB92ADmRT3xeGrDbwSvOo1oP0M B66yrpBhIGNY3EB9CtUX2Sy5B+0OaxI4oDqiOa2D5AgA6XfZnjI9S3GRgpMu5gyI Rbtw5rSoiYGWcBr+2RE9xqyCPsd3AZm5U3FVdyIdxmRneZXmXRpSGP7O/dZ3qFXf vgx2nK5VdNcDyE71xKNP+/jxYfDttaRTEJyHLNoOw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=INhXBT CrzNviKJgVwskxfaeDdbRcrXtMRJV7pEcRcks=; b=pldAeoyedbiMS3TOJeYuBc Gldqn4sSJhIc0Jkj9WDJgJGrrR+FvUIp7R42oxPicZFsRu95sjXl0IQPyuCKfrle juCRNhZpYRthJvZh1ilSM35SrKxKeQgS7R00J47uBERKZP7UtRVnSxrN8zafQzPP V4PMOPtuUF/wL0NMYwigTq7SvERk9nq42rmNhilwNnkY7Lk7oqL1K1tkIJO2rgwF ix44fKZF8Fbyo/yFMfRy1rEyyFa7f2zGF9qFhHAZfyYXfgXkAnpl0YVpGTVSVpVD 3nYyVYbhhF+b9W1C3ZnxcJAZzzaz8+0UuvIvBdgcuMXZCylP8oN8nUPFM50jY6Qg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:NJVwWsI-3xNdP16DpaQWo4gVYKXwZn1igOrMw-yz7Ue8rJewIBrPbQ>
Received: from [10.19.234.244] (unknown [128.107.241.176]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E4B83246A5; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:54:26 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <EA611862-03E6-4E6E-8221-20EC57E47D98@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:54:24 -0500
Cc: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <055F4469-EC52-4B7B-B661-661647FF222B@cooperw.in>
References: <151681599994.22697.16969006332176223005@ietfa.amsl.com> <EA611862-03E6-4E6E-8221-20EC57E47D98@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Q73XZZpP5ALhvaz57SM6zqkXnlk>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:54:31 -0000

> On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 8. Section 4:
>> 
>> 'It is anticipated that
>>   those roles will evolve.  The IASA is responsible for keeping the
>>   community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating
>>   this memo.'
>> 
>> I would be a little concerned if some of the key roles would change without
>> this document being updated. I understand the need to be flexible, but we need
>> to put some limits. Maybe at least emphasize the need to inform the community
>> by a MUST. For example:
>> 
>> 'It is anticipated that
>>   those roles will evolve.  The IASA MUST keep the
>>   community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating
>>   this memo.'
> 
> I don't think the MUST significantly changes the meaning, so I'm ambivalent about the change. Since this text was put in to address a comment in AD Evaluation, I'm inclined to hear from Alissa.

Perhaps the concern could be addressed by saying “without first updating this memo”? The point I raised is that this document shouldn’t gate the ability for the roles to change, but certainly if they do change the document should be updated (or obsoleted by a new document) to match the reality.

Thanks,
Alissa