Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 16 May 2013 09:57 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EA921F91B0 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 02:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uhl+mFOvw+on for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 02:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B07521F8F2E for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 02:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0902CC48; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:57:08 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DPWn98dj1ClC; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:57:07 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684212CC3C; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:57:07 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <020001ce32b3$a06aed60$e140c820$@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 12:57:07 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CC4A79CF-2055-45E2-AEA4-496A2F152EFA@piuha.net>
References: <020001ce32b3$a06aed60$e140c820$@gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:57:14 -0000
Thanks for your Review, Roni. These reviews are very important for me to do my work at the IESG. I plan to ballot no objection for this draft (although I agree with some of the issues raised by my AD colleagues). Jari On Apr 6, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-03 > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date:2013–4–6 > IETF LC End Date: 2013-4–12 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > • I found this draft very informational but I was wondering if it will be better to have in the introduction and the abstract a sentence that will mention the target audience for this draft. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art