Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 30 August 2016 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595AC12D13F; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ph7AnDB9Zala; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3724512D108; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774F92CC9B; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:45:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4oorZHKmld2; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:45:07 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9932CC40; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:45:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_75E3F4E0-0BB5-444E-ACC8-6FE96B6A35AA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <c89578a5-07b9-1d80-d855-3933d14c69a0@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:45:06 +0300
Message-Id: <AB06DDDD-514F-4C8B-AD0D-5C6437F0034C@piuha.net>
References: <0a6a03b5-e2a1-ec55-f442-fd281c197649@nostrum.com> <6d22d0e0-ba32-5a6a-f3f4-b0aed9c95dc6@joelhalpern.com> <c89578a5-07b9-1d80-d855-3933d14c69a0@joelhalpern.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/RfsO8fN10Y9Wes-kaHIfYT0wmC4>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:45:12 -0000

Many thanks for the review, Joel!

Jari

On 26 Aug 2016, at 03:55, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
> 
> (I think I even see why the reference in section 3.3 is point to 2.1.)
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 7/5/16 6:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt
>>    Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout
>> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
>> Review Date: 5-July-2016
>> IETF LC End Date: 12-July-2016
>> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>> 
>> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
>> 
>> The reviewer notes that he fouund the document quite readable, but
>> nonetheless made no effort to review the storage details.
>> 
>> Major issues:
>> 
>> Minor issues:
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>    It seems likely that the cross-reference in section 3.3 paragraph 1
>> which points to section 2.1 is actually intended to point to section 3.1
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art