IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net> Fri, 21 September 2012 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@estacado.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F3921F8714; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uj9eyjtDjpjG; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from estacado.net (vicuna.estacado.net [4.30.77.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A0421F8713; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.12.11.64] ([10.12.11.64]) (authenticated bits=0) by estacado.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q8LGFHZY004661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:15:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@estacado.net)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>
In-Reply-To: <505C8D41.5080202@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:15:12 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5D60CD10-21CA-4DF6-899C-99359EC6C8F2@estacado.net>
References: <8CE78C42-20B9-45BC-A872-90E7FBE27D24@nostrum.com> <505C866B.9050506@qualcomm.com> <505C8B52.6070603@qualcomm.com> <505C8D41.5080202@gmail.com>
To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498)
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org List" <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:15:20 -0000

On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On 09/21/2012 10:44 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> On 9/21/12 10:23 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>>>> -- The abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5721
> 
> Why?  There is a statement in the header, 10 lines above the abstract, that says "Obsoletes: 5721 (if approved)".

The abstract is sometimes displayed without the rest of the document, for example, in new RFC announcements.

> 
>>> 
>>> It does.
>> 
>> Sorry. You said abstract, not intro. Got it.
>> 
>> pr
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email