Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-06.txt

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Thu, 11 October 2018 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40A7130E64; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Fgl24rjHSxQ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357A0130E62; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1717; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1539261496; x=1540471096; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KRP+59vRrzuNTC/R573hXrSHAlSj/U3kup3wIggjz3A=; b=IwQXTWHsqy4ajjvB9QaWn1IpRG0RapXaFgvdht9W5qFvMr5r3cFClLyy 5n6Z6sBfp1Nvdp+FsHpFUd2u/vERInm/UIZPm6GGIVsacuMwGsAnj9hiC SRDQTEc2YYk1wui+HDTGPdVMm5H/TMGe50mwivl+3W7bGrXLBk/K1gJCY w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A9AACeQ79b/xbLJq1iGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBZYJqfyiMao1kmHoNI4RJAoR2OBYBAwEBAgEBAm0cDIU6AQUnEUABEAsQBAQJFg8JAwIBAgFFBgEMAQUCAQGDHYIBD6cOJQ6EeIRcBYtcgUE/gRKDEoMbAoc5AokLhWiPHQmGUooCF4FPhGuCa4ZsiRSDIIlegVkhgVUzGggbFYMnhmOENIVAPTCMYQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,368,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="7163870"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Oct 2018 12:38:13 +0000
Received: from [10.147.24.55] ([10.147.24.55]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9BCcCBM028769; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:38:13 GMT
Message-ID: <5BBF4434.2020100@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:38:12 +0200
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>, gen-art@ietf.org
CC: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id.all@ietf.org
References: <201810110827.w9B8R0Ep092193@givry.fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <201810110827.w9B8R0Ep092193@givry.fdupont.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.147.24.55, [10.147.24.55]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/RqGSf72ORnMxzjWTGRCw31Jlv7g>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:38:19 -0000

Hi Francis,

I have included your comments in the new version (8) that has been 
published.

thanks,
Peter

On 11/10/18 10:27 , Francis Dupont wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-06.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 20181005
> IETF LC End Date: 20181010
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>
> Summary: Ready
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>   I reviewed the version 06 but the version 07 is available so I am
> trying to update my comments to the last version:
>   - Abstract page 1: add "(LLS)" after "link-local signalling"
>
>   - Requirement Language: usually it is in its own section in the body.
>    I leave this to the RFC Editor, i.e. if it should be moved (s)he
>    will do this.
>
>   - ToC page 3 and 7 page 5: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
>
>   - 1 page 2: in theory you should introduce the LSA abbrev but as the
>    whole document is about OSPF IMHO there is no strict requirement to
>    introduce OSPF specific common abbrevs...
>
>   - 1 page 3: add "(LLS)" after "link-local signalling"
>    (note the Abstract is independent so the LLS abbrev should be introduced
>     twice and at its first use).
>
>   - Authors' page 7: BE -> Belgium (for consistency with other addresses)
>
> Regards
>
> Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
> .
>