[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-02.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Mon, 24 October 2011 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ADB21F8D77 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.52
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57nl2nJL7NsJ for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE7021F8D75 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost []) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9ODEvr3025533; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:14:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201110241314.p9ODEvr3025533@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:14:57 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:15:04 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20111014
IETF LC End Date: 20110926
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: I've seen some comments during the last call,
perhaps this is why the current version is 03 but I reviewed (and forgot
to send the review) the version 02.
 - 3.3.1 page 14: I suggest m=* in place of m=??

 - 4 page 15 (comment): in general encryption is done after
  compression for crypto reasons and common sense: encryption gives a
  perfectly random result, i.e., something impossible to compress...

 - Authors' Addresses page 19: United States -> USA

Regards (and sorry for the delay, but my comments could (should!) be handled
by the RFC Editor)