[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 13 November 2015 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78281B3F81; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:42:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdbtxVvQOSzH; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724801B3F80; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so86038177pac.3; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:42:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I69ab03d15Dz686Nu2a1gfSjEOPzjgAp+7SSvBHHtgA=; b=J9LRelr05JSDZlzVrb0t0rpwfqIKwoq615579VO1VPByOfoounIUI/Y8LwGDHl8gk0 HnioxLtJuXUgYdV0hEwwgrf+jkM4ZjPbEKjqhx6aOM0TNaOr482k3fHI4swdfpf6jjrM VvsVopbAEvsqtlUx9Z8l9frlb51uBG/cHE87sLhhsoX0jrJMZzyoDfUlQgaoY2VZTlf8 yzuIy0Y2Ngku2HKVR7UDroo1iCPw3JJfIoQZUR4eXXMZgtVBnQFPM2EeyPG6ixp0W2rb 2lT/grk74ygOZWeviSalXjsMsM+EVWK3wa0e8opROGE3RxtuRShScvf9EeZGhjJkkAPj N2Ag==
X-Received: by 10.66.184.42 with SMTP id er10mr29136196pac.117.1447386124042; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:58dd:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:58dd:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uy1sm17404975pac.39.2015.11.12.19.42.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:42:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56455C12.5060301@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:42:10 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/T4okfMTWdrvWx2ckg4O_YRVmCgo>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:42:06 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-11-13
IETF LC End Date: 2015-11-09
IESG Telechat date: 2015-11-19

Summary: Ready with issues
--------

Comment:
--------

I haven't seen a response to my Last Call review, so this is the same.

Needs to be approved along with draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence.

Major Issues:
-------------

> 3.2.1.  Autonomous system
>
>   [RFC3209] already defines 2-Byte AS number.
>
>   To support 4-Byte AS numbers as per [RFC6793], the following
>   subobject is defined:
>
>      0                   1                   2                   3
>      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>     |L|    Type     |     Length    |         Reserved              |
>     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>     |                          AS-ID (4 bytes)                      |
>     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

I don't understand why that is considered Experimental. It seems like
a major defect in RFC 3209 that needs to be fixed on the standards
track as soon as possible, independently of the present draft.

Minor Issues:
-------------

It would be nice to see a suggested timescale for the experiment in section 1.1.
How many years before this document should be evaluated?