IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 03 April 2018 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2403F12D7E8; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=AHoSabJB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=NrtTVT4M
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvS9YioKo36f; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70DF12D7E5; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3305320BC2; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:38:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:38:24 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=G9Dk8N9q/Rt2NTFjCE89/zxQWLApa xgw3xl24lrqks0=; b=AHoSabJBv9FEAVJdenIIopNzxvLSavvhzAkMVoySN/2ya xu0UWbLBI16ztA/qBmSUaMTJTVkyn6160n2i1QqQQULMJ6IzuhbNG3fbh2xfTJ6e 8scrb1wPjZsW18ENMXBTiMY+X6z7inpPnKJFoi87gPu1B3JsHVEdPVn+Gv9PKA/I xuHzslDe7R8ubNwEVrJbY8mVx/vkWdz3foyzmqsaLyxbf1O6gdfsyfmxs/QAGrwu 56vwdd4qf98hyA2hKoCT3PhawefjdIcqr59F1VP0IPe5MlcwHpxqmVSOauUwg7BK BPYmynnRa7XAIoWl57LE3ErToidWCV0ZKuXHHHvAQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=G9Dk8N 9q/Rt2NTFjCE89/zxQWLApaxgw3xl24lrqks0=; b=NrtTVT4MbKJPwjyz6fUsK1 f/GFvfpAfCSu/WBZZjdTki677TXlq9Zfu9p/uqaJdn2e1FPSfeddWHAVLNzHyOmJ qfU4eEFhgl8F8i7hijWJaEaCESuvpOngptfja0h0tE9Tim3elvJtrge18xQ4TH+2 iSq++yWL8ukpXqnf7ccBIZzFN33u0sB0vN+vmcZuyaT4UeRDwTWCvL8lEoAB2rKL eF58MzwFrDebZ6J/EKO9kuSxYSoFl6UAvh5d5HoPvcSS+mGBgU+mFF6nlzl3TFf4 CukVuk77a6BV+bbYGt+guiuIprlW2svCJKANlVsqQWDyALmcP3Bcs7EbsZtfT4Lg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ELzDWswJKOJ4Yi6z_CiuqWbVFfYEMBGwxTmLaNq15mVgrYG0b1HVVA>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro3.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B7239E4412; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <151966446045.31474.2565002909272861036@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:38:23 -0400
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana.all@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C2B6C9FF-B7CB-4627-86D7-5B383D1C0692@cooperw.in>
References: <151966446045.31474.2565002909272861036@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/UKCPqN1CpFPMHS5-TYRZcnwrtqk>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 17:38:30 -0000

Dan, thanks for your review. I agree with your point about normatively referencing RFC 6275; I think your other points may be taken up at the authors’ discretion. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Feb 26, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 2018-02-26
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This is a simple and straightforward document, fixing an omission in RFC 6275,
> which updated RFC 4861 without explicitly marking it as such,  and failed to
> create a registry to avoid conflicts. The content of the document looks fine,
> but there are several minor issues that I would recommend to be considered and
> discussed before approval and publication.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> 1. As this document fixes a problem created by RFC 6275 which was was not
> marked as updating RFC 4861, and did not create a registry to avoid conflicts,
> it looks like this RFC (if approved) should also update RFC 6275.
> 
> 2. Section 3 includes a reference to [IANA-TBD] which is not defined in the
> document.
> 
> 3. As the new registry contains one bit defined by RFC 6275, it seems that
> [RFC6275] should also be a Normative Reference.
> 
> 4. Section 4 - It would be good to capitalize Standards Action, and refer to
> RFC 8126 as reference (also to be added)
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 1. The Abstract and the Introduction contain a sentence with broken syntax:
> 
> 'The purpose of this document is to request that IANA to create a new registry
> ...'
> 
> 2. Several acronyms in the document are not explicitly expanded: ND, PIO, NDP
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email