Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-org-10
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 08 October 2018 20:43 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB27130FED; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HY1lllC3JC8e; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C6413101B; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w98KhrNu013555 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:43:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.roach.at
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-org.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org
References: <153901754767.18394.16009685138305515508@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <4fc76632-0be3-631d-0195-201e1eaf96e0@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 15:43:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <153901754767.18394.16009685138305515508@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/UODeej7d7Vijz4B3gvNiPNAkL7A>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-org-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 20:43:59 -0000
On 10/8/18 11:52 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > The RFC 2718 normative reference is a bit strange to one that does not normally > work in this area. Thanks! This is a good catch of a character transposition. The correct reference here should be RFC 2781 rather than RFC 2718. While this is still technically a downref to an informational document, UTF-16 has precedent for being normatively in relation to XML, and so appears in the the downref registry already. /a
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-r… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Adam Roach
- Re: [Gen-art] [regext] Genart last call review of… Linlin Zhou